High Court Karnataka High Court

Govindarajulu Naidu Since … vs Sri S Udaya Kumar on 3 November, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Govindarajulu Naidu Since … vs Sri S Udaya Kumar on 3 November, 2010
Author: A.S.Pachhapure
 

in TI-IE I-KGH COURT 01-' KARHATAKA AT BANGAIQRE
mmn ms THE 3% DAY :3? mvsnmza  %

swam:   %   '  .

Tim HQBPBLE pm. manna A.S.PAC}{1£.é.f'E3;'R§:: . T4  ~    

1 'I

 

BETWEEN:

GOVI1*I%fiaIULU2I£.]I."i:¥'.}~..    
smmsz DECEASED BY I-:1$J%L1&*s  1  

1.

s1wrR.e.crimmh51§$A’%%Aj:

Wm. mm
mam 2¥;BC5§F1’V-?§ ragga, %

2. sR:§.<:§;

31:2. mm z.*30vz1:oHAR.Mt3LU Ham,
AGEII) £3013? %55;>&*1%;5R:s.

3*
.3»; 0.” LATE’ ]V RAM},

é “AGED AEQ[IT¥F¥YEAR3.

– X SIG. SELVARMU,

-362:1} Again 33 YEARS.

% X SRiI;…A?H~IOBI-I

» A ‘ 0. LATE 8ELVARAJU,
A L};x:3m:: AB<:)U'I' 34 YEARS. PETTZTORERS

A A '(ifi"Y$RI. V. B.SHIVAI{UMAR, wvmam

$3;

8R1. S. Um-‘1YA KUMAR
S C). LATE SKIYAHARAYANA,
CIR BY AGE.

219:: Im.15]2,
mmmmmm
mwmmmwmmL

Sm. I’AKS}il&mEVfiMB&A”«:

{DECEASED}

sRz.vmnmzmMAR;%%%%T%’

s;c>.LA*rE

MAJOR BY ASE,

R AT.RO.3;”‘ €)LI¥3 , mm%%1′”;jkL ‘. %
Sé awgm

P?H’I(}$_RC;S! _ ,.

sm R. fifififiifii %
smcg :>Ec.3%As%3,u%1§ar _1–;’1s was

i;_ _ am.

MAJ:;’3R’B¥Aj&GE.

” — BY AGE.

. um}

MAJDR BY AGE.

smxssm,

MAJQR BY AGE .

«:3 smtassg,

BEAJCBR BY AGE.

vi; sm*.z~mMA,

MAJOR BY AGE .

vii] SMT.PRABI-IA,
magma BY AGE.

um sxvmvasnmax, L
MMQREYAGE. * *

“my SR1. NARAYAN,
MAJOR BY AGE.

3:] SRLRAMU,
MAJORBYAG§§{; _

znzswme: AND~{ZEI}_’I’€3{X3 ‘
ARE 1f,3.a:.IJc;}m;ERs :35′
IMIIZSLI
RESIDPHG A3: .ELECi’I?IC
_S§E&fIt:tE’.$, F:’9′.=1V3v,’AC__iA A3333
Am 3333;; UL$r;>*<:JR,

5. am mzsmm Kimm,

319. LATE VA.,RA1%.§fiS’WAhdY mm},
> 3′!’ £33,
é ELEC’rRiCAL Hausa
A –.’§O.{423~,4v1fiADHVARfiYA zwmmaa
X T F3432 mm,
BARGAIQRE 5. RESPEIIHDENTS

% my sm-mmmB ALIKI-IAN. mu, ma R1
. R2-13′:E8D, R3-SERVEE,
T ‘manua 5 ARE gamma ms emm mrm
% A.%4.::*2n1a)

THIS WZP. IS FEED UHI.’)ER ARTKJLES 226 A313

017′ mam CGK8’I’I’I’U’1″EGH ACT, mama T9
” QUASH ‘Fifi QRDER DT. 22.9i2m8, VME ARK:-A, ON

af deomacd S:nt.S.Ls.Emhmidevamma. In support tsfjttzfe

applicatian he mad an amaava; atating

Smt.S.La1m1mid¢:a:rs.m,ma hacl taimm him iii’

her fi’etu11e’ ‘ wimn he was aged

them wan a 2mm’ tea-ed a.i11cant can not be breught an

€321 this he ma acught for dism£saa1 uf

Tm trial’ Court heard the mwtm

the sidw and an apprwmkfinn of the

‘ remrd allewed the appiimtioti. ‘

‘ V’ erdm’, the presmzt petfimtz has been fikeci.

V’ , gpv+’e1:.itionm aid aka the rmponflcnts. F’

4.Ihave&rdt11e1ear1@a::au;1me1fiart}m

5* In an application filed under Grder 22

rfw. 352.15: am, there ‘E: as adjudication
tn mJ1d1′ ’13; cf’ the 1:: {ref 2

ciwmscd Smt.S.I.a1mhn’n’dc:xramtna ‘;.¢ Time $’r£ia:t:§;;,gg

to 0:113; Izaak am the 505

mwrd claimm to 1x;. a the:
dised sf the
afidavit in gugifiaert %h an
mama in the year
1994 11 ymrs cld am the
ta be mzacubed in the

year my mmua% the matter which hm to an

3 V’ wfigidéiéfibfis whiie aamidarifig the qumtian

H has lam dfiputad, but at: far as
V mi mapaxxient as a kgal repazmrrxativze of
ciaéae-rfiéied 8mt.S.Lamhm:fievamma, it E only prime.

which has m be 1mm: “mm, as he wauld

a raga}. rmmzazixm of 1:116 dwaaaed far

‘ ” @¢11:.ti.n:.1.a.1;inz3 of the In that view if the

maértmgldo mtfindar1ym¢:”iti:1tkn*spetitinna11ditia

a::mzdir2g1y’d?mm7::assaci.

$3/3

Itldgej j;