High Court Kerala High Court

Rajeev vs State Of Kerala on 3 March, 2008

Kerala High Court
Rajeev vs State Of Kerala on 3 March, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1299 of 2008()


1. RAJEEV,S/O.NARAYANAN
                      ...  Petitioner
2. PRASAD,
3. SATHEESH,
4. RAMSEH,
5. MANIKANDAN,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :03/03/2008

 O R D E R
                           R.BASANT, J.
                        ----------------------
                        B.A.No.1299 of 2008
                    ----------------------------------------
           Dated this the 3rd day of March 2008

                               O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. Petitioners are accused 1

to 5. Altogether there are six accused persons. The crux of the

allegations against the petitioners is that they had obstructed a

public servant, the driver of a K.S.R.T.C bus in the discharge of

his official duties and had allegedly caused damage to the

vehicle which attracts the offence punishable under Section 3 of

the P.D.P.P.Act.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

the petitioners are absolutely innocent. The K.S.R.T.C. bus was

being driven in such a rash and negligent manner. The

petitioners had questioned the same. On account of this

animosity, totally false and vexatious allegations are being

raised. There is no allegation of physical assault. The only

allegation is about the damage caused to the K.S.R.T.C bus. This

allegedly was not caused deliberately by the petitioners; but it

was suffered in the accident.

B.A.No.1299/08 2

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners prays, the

learned Public Prosecutor does not oppose the said prayer and I

am satisfied that the petitioners can be granted anticipatory bail

subject to appropriate terms and conditions.

4. In the result, this petition is allowed. Following

directions are issued under Section 438 Cr.P.C in favour of the

petitioners.

i) Petitioners shall surrender before the learned

Magistrate having jurisdiction at 11 a.m on 10/03/2008. They

shall be released on regular bail on condition that they execute

bonds for Rs.25,000/-(Rupees twenty five thousand only) each

with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction

of the learned Magistrate.

ii) The petitioners shall make themselves available for

interrogation before the investigating officer between 10 a.m

and 1 p.m on 11/03/2008 and 12/03/2008. During this period,

the investigating officer shall be at liberty to interrogate the

petitioners in custody and take all necessary steps for the proper

conduct of the investigation in this crime. Thereafter the

petitioners shall so appear on all Mondays between 10 a.m and

B.A.No.1299/08 3

12 noon for a period of one month. Subsequently the petitioners

shall so appear as and when directed by the investigating officer

in writing to do so.

(iii) If the petitioners do not appear before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (i), directions issued above shall

thereafter stand revoked and the police shall be at liberty to

arrest the petitioners and deal with them in accordance with law,

as if these directions were not issued at all.

(iv) If they were arrested prior to 10/03/2008, they shall

be released from custody on their executing a bond for

Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) without any

sureties, undertaking to appear before the learned Magistrate on

10/03/2008.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
jsr

B.A.No.1299/08 4

B.A.No.1299/08 5

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007