New India Assurance Co Ltd vs K N Subramanyam S/O … on 28 October, 2010

_. _ Unity Building,
 "J¢C.R0ad;"'A  _
 Ba.f1gaI0r¢?'~E  

IN THE HIGH comm' OF KARNATAKA AT  V.

DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBIEH,' 2033-"  -  k

:PRESENT:'*"'»--.. V _ _ V
THE HON'BLE    
*.,_;gp_  1 % 
THE I-ION'BLE 

M.F.A.i§Io. 2.9 1   2067.. (MV)
_M.F.A....Nn.j;8123.91? 2Q07(MV)

M.F.A.No. 291:5: D';?~20o§*'  "V.

Between:

New India Assiirancfi «C0.»,._I;td f
Represented by '  _ '  '
Div1'siona1'Ju\/Iétnager,  _ 

4"' Floor, Tower Block,  

Mission. Road,' E.

....AppelIant

(By  R,JHj§.rHkash, Advocate)



   K.NIA_Subramanyam,

3.S'/ 0". Muninarayanappa,
R/at. Kundalagurki Village,

 " "Kasaba Hobli,

Sidlaghatta Taluk.

 



. 

vV’7Between:

. V .t ‘sutiframanyam.
* . i 0.. l\/Iuriinarayanappa,
‘ V . V _Kun.da1g”urki Village,

._ we > ._Ka.saba Hobli,
it ‘ V V _ Sidiaghatta Taluk,

2. R.Man}unath
Major,
S/o. Ramanna,
R/at. K.N.S. Post,
Kolar. b

3. N.Venkatesh

Major,
S/o. Manyappa,

R/at. No. 37,
J ogireddy Buildxng,
Chikkadugodi,

Madivala Post,

Banga1ore–29. _
” V .. __ . . Respondents

(By Sri. D.L. ..

Notice to dispensed \?’i¥i’£:?L,V/’Q dated 10/ 07/ 2007]

t A”*.5!=-‘.’¥.=k=3=V=i’=’*

This MFA is f11e.c1..w.s-z_7:3{_1).or MV Act against the
judgment andgward’ dated:.O9_/2.006 passed in MVC No.
18/2003 on the filetéof theCiyii~._Judge[Sr.Dn], Addl. MACT,
Chinthamani, awarding a compensation of 32,17,600/– with
an interest at 6% PA-.. ufrorn the date of petition till payment
andvto setV_~a£3ide ‘1″11e sam”e;-. ….. .. v

Aged Vaboirt 43 years,

Banga1.Q_re~27. Ad

Pin C0de–562 105.

(By Sri. N.G0pa1akrishna, Advocate)

And:

1. Sri. R.Manjunatha,

Driver,

S/0. Ramanna,
Hindu,

K.N.S.P0st,

Kolar,

Pin–563 126.

2. Sri. N.Venkatesh,..
Owner, H _. .

S/0. Mariyappga,

Hindu, *

Major, **** j. 3;;

Resident 0fN0._3’7,W_g — .
J0ggiredc1y–.Bui’1dir1g,’ ” __
Chikkakadu’gQCii,% ‘ ” N V’
Madivala Post;

Bangalore-v~29. V

3′.’:’V Nexardtlridia Zksésurarteed Co. ,
v _
Vakkiiiigarva’ Vans.
Hudson–.Circie.” * –. ‘

…Respondents

4: ‘S1ji.K;s?~J,SI1’V1aiVasa, Advocate for R3:

****=1¢*

V *–.Ap.pea}tsta_1″1jds dismissed against R1 & R2 on 11/01/2010]

“‘I’fiis MFA is filed U/S 173(1) of MV Act against the

édjudgrnent and award dated: 09/ 10/ 2006 passed in MVC No.
“L8/2003 on the file of the Civil Judge[Sr.Dn}, Add}. MACT,

%M

if

. it ” tsn*

IE}

modified, awarding compensation of 12,44,600/~

?2.17,600/–. The enhanced compensationjr’ V’

€27,000/- with interest at 6% p.a.,.;frer.ri’theehdlateiiof .Vpetid’tioln,A it

till its realisation.

The Insurer is directed “utp depo_sit_u lthel”:..;e’nha.”:r1ced ”

compensation with interest threenweek’s~ .Fron1E the date
of receipt of a copy of

The enhanced he released in
favour of deposit by the

Insurer.

The statih1tQry_V:’depQs1t..__ma’de by the Insurer shall be
transmitted to the». Tribunal immediately.

Draw thew-award, accerdingly.

sd/=2
Iudg7’e’

3d/zl
Iud§5

u…-…/n….\J:…4