Karnataka High Court
Sri K M Maruthi S/O K.R.Mariappa vs The Managing Director on 7 August, 2009
" '-{BY 3,;-7§'JA¥ARA§3 '&'"A} s}
..1-
IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA, Brmeam % T; $ "
DATED THIS THE 7m my (}1'?':'!.-II(.}l"_')'S'VI_,i; 239$ "
BEFORE X i
THE HODPBLE MR.JUSTIG.:E"'RAM. "1v1QI«LAIj~z Iiééfibbf
MIsc.wRrrs No. %543 1 ,. 8£"'7_'791 (",>'F 20409
WRIT PETYPION No.9224 .65 9333-6.3_%T'0£§.V2Qo9 (GM-KEB)
K M MARUTHVI
Sm. K R MARIAPPA '
AGE 36,r'1?ELA,.Ry'3:- " _
R/AT No. 90/714
V¥DYAPEE'I'HA Re-Am ' ~ _
1<:ENc;ER1~ KC-TE,' KENC:--ERI_{H}"
BANGALORE_a# 50.' _ ' " . ,
._ " . % PETITIONER
(COMMON)
Am"j " V
1 A ' 'THE .MA_NAGING DIRECTOR
BA:NG;'&i;0RE ELEC'FRICi'FY
SUPPLY COMPANY um.
.. CBAB COMPLEX, CAUVERY BHAVAN
"FSANGALORE ~ 9.
THE ASSiS'i'ANT EXECUTIVE
ENGINEER, W--7 SUBJDIVISION
BESCOM, KENGERI, BANGALORE ---- 60.
RESPONDENTS
(common)
bi
-2,
(BY SR}. N K GUPTA, AV FOR R1 as R2)
(BY SRIVARU LAW FIRM, FOR J =
PROPOSED RESPONDENT IN MISc.w,5432;Oé1: .
PROPOSED RESPONDENT No.3 IR;'M1SO;;§i'E432;Og. V' ', E 1:'
K v SHENOY
S/O. K SRIDHAR SHENOY
AGE 45 YEARS V
OCC: BANKER
R/AT NO. 831, 181' FLGGR, 13TH MA!N;'5TH CROSS
HANUMANTHA NAGAR, 'BANGAL€)'i?E'*----.-
MISC.W.543_1/09 FELED I¥_l\EDER_ ASE/CPION 151 OF
CPC PRAYING_'I'Q VADATE _'l."«HEV I~RrER1;;a ORDER DATED
21.4.09. . 4_
MISO.€w.54E2/O9' 4Rii;*ED:""UN'DER ORDER 1 RULE
10(2) __C'PR'_C *:RRA=aRO IMPLEAD PROPOSED
RESPO£flDENT"fi;S R3, . E
msczw. 77_9"1,IzS9"ER;LE*D UNDER SECTION 340 OF
Cr.PC FOR'REF'ERR_ING THE MATTER TO JURISDICTIONAL
MAOIS%:RATE; _
REESE MISOWREFS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
I:)AY_, RHE.OOORr MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
the applicant has no lis with the
H H ” Dietizipnéf. and therefore, the Misceilaneous Writ
4&«EApkpnc3Eon No.5432 to implead h1’1nSe1f in the
“prbceedmg is not mamtajnable. ML
-3.
Having heard the learned counsel for
for considerable time, learned counsel {the ..
court to Withdraw the applicati(:.)’VIp:AzA;V
accordingly rejected. As a “‘–gbnseqt_vfi-*xc<§,. Misc.
W.Nos. 543 1/09 and 779 1 / ' '