The Divisional Controller vs Sri Khader Basha on 11 September, 2009

W. P. No. 26 98.322009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT 

DATED THIS THE 1 1TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2099 _

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE   

BETWEEN:

THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER
K.S.R.T.C., KOLAR DIVISION

KOLAR V _ 

REPRESENTED BY ITS ' -   ;   

CHIEF LAW OFFICER  .  1  "'v...;PE'._i'ITIONER

{BY SR1 K.S.EHARA-T::aI';I<UI\/EAR, AIBVOCAT-EV.}'  '

AND:

SR1 KHADER EASH~A.._   

S/O TAILOR HUSAINSAE  

R/AT YANAMALAFADI'  '

CHINTAMANITALIVJK' _ . A _.

KOLARDISTRICT     ..RESPONDENT

  ' PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 8:
227. OF.TII.E'CVONS*:.'ITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR

THE-RECO.R;E)_S ON.-'l'HE FILE OF THE 11 ADDITIONAL LABOUR
COIIRE BANGA__L(P)RE, IN RESPECT OF I.D.NO.23/2006 AND '10
QUASH THE ORDER AT ANNEXUREC DTD 13.3.2009 PASSED

'IN THE'  CASE.

 .-THIS" FETmON COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

   THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

Writ petigion No.26983[2QQ9AgL-'kgéig -   * - 7



M2",

W.P.No.26983g2009
O R D E R

Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner,

after arguing the matter for some time, submits:

the Writ petition may be disposed of with a di.r;é’ct%@§1′:.5to A V’

the 11 Additional Labour Court, Ba;?;gal–ore, to it

the proceeding in I.D.No.23/2006 it ruont1:is*-.Vt:’t”

from today. Having regard’ toflthe factsof
i accept the submission~made””t3jfVt.:the’e’1.ea1*ned”Counse}
and accordingly direct dispose of

the aforesaid 3~pi’o.oeedingg eatpeditiiousif and in any

event before Jjaiillgary’ 2010.

Petition _. _vchhlispVosed._of.

– Sd/-

….. .. » JUDGE