High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Dr. Kartik Prasad vs State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr on 24 June, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Dr. Kartik Prasad vs State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr on 24 June, 2010
                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Cr.Misc. No.10210 of 2000
                                    DR. KARTIK PRASAD
                                          Versus
                                   STATE OF BIHAR & ANR
                                       -----------

9. 24.6.2010. Heard Sri Umakant Prasad, learned

counsel for the petitioner and also heard the

learned A.P.P. for the State.

This petition has been preferred by the

petitioner Dr. Kartik Prasad to seek a relief of

quashing the order dated 16.8.1999 by which the

petitioner and other accused persons were

summoned for allegedly committing various

offences including that under Section 498A of

the Penal Code. It hardly requires to be pointed

out that allegations made in the complaint

petition has to be taken as true on their face

value and, thereafter, the court has to discern

from it the constitution of an offence. If no

offence is constituted or, in other words, if

there is no allegation of participation in

commission of the offence then order summoning

an accused has always to be held falling sort of

the settled law. Reference might may be made in

the above behalf to a huge line of decisions

starting from R.P.Kapur Vrs. State of Punjab AIR

1960 SC 866 and Chandra Deo Singh Vrs. Prokash
-2-

Chandra Bose AIR 1963 SC 1430. I have perused

the complaint petition and only two statements

appear made against the petitioner that he was

acting as a negotiator for settlement of the

marriage and further that he had participated as

a Barati in the marriage ceremony and had

performed “Gunghat” ceremony. Except the above,

there is no allegations of illtreatment and

torture meted out to the complainant. Besides,

the petitioner does not appear either as a

relative or a family member of the complainant’s

husband.

Regard being had to the above facts and

statements made in the complainant petition in

the light of the settled principle of law as

regards the summoning order dated 16.8.1999

passed by Sri S.P.Mishra, Judicial Magistrate,

Bhagalpur in Complaint Case No.386 of 1999, the

same is hereby quashed. As regards the other

part of the order that shall remain as it is. If

any stay was granted that shall stand vacated.

( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )
B.Kr.