High Court Kerala High Court

Indian Bank vs P.N.Krishna Kumar on 30 July, 2008

Kerala High Court
Indian Bank vs P.N.Krishna Kumar on 30 July, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 23075 of 2008(V)



1. INDIAN BANK, GURUVAYUR BRANCH
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. P.N.KRISHNA KUMAR
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.EASWARAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :30/07/2008

 O R D E R
                M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.
            ===========================
           W.P.(C) NO.23075     OF 2008
            ===========================

       Dated this the 30th day of July, 2008

                      JUDGMENT

This petition is filed under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India by the plaintiff decree

holder in O.S.427/1993 on the file of Sub Court,

Thrissur for a direction to Sub Court, Thrissur to

issue certified copy of the order passed in

I.A.5175/2008, an application filed under section 5

of the Limitation Act to condone the delay in

filing the review petition and also for a direction

to the Sub Court not to pass final order in

I.A.5176/2008, an application for review.

2. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner

was heard.

3. The argument of the learned counsel is that

without considering the material facts, Ext.P7

application filed under section 5 of the Limitation

Act to condone the delay of 4600 days, was allowed

by the learned Sub Judge and Ext.P8 petition was

W.P.(C)23075/2008 2

filed under Rule 1 of Order XLVII of Code of Civil

Procedure to review the judgment is posted for

passing orders and though petitioner applied for

certified copy of the order passed in Ext.P7

application, it was not allowed. The learned

counsel argued that Ext.P2 judgment and Ext.P3

decree were passed as early as 28.2.1995 and

subsequently petitioner executed the decree before

the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Ernakulam as evidenced

by Ext.P6 order of confirmation of sale of

immovable property on 20.9.2007 and it is

thereafter Exts.P7 and P8 applications were filed

and learned Sub Judge did not have the

jurisdiction to consider the application as the

decree amount exceeds Rs.10 lakhs and petitioner

is entitled to challenge the order passed in Ext.P7

application and therefore necessary directions be

issued.

4. On the facts stated by the learned counsel,

Sub Judge, Thrissur is directed to issue certified

copy of the order passed in I.A.5175/2008 within

W.P.(C)23075/2008 3

ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment. Sub Judge is further directed not to

dispose of I.A.5176/2008 for two weeks.

Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
JUDGE
tpl/-

W.P.(C)23075/2008    4

                         M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.




                            ---------------------
                             W.P.(C).NO. /06
                            ---------------------


                                JUDGMENT




                             SEPTEMBER,2006