HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE
SEFORE THE LOK ADALAT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DANGA,LO'R}:A-'C10,
DATED THIS THE 3"' £)AY OF JUNE 2009*-..:
CONCILIATORS PRES?{E;NT:::"' -r I
HON'BLE MRJUSTICE s.N,sAT\fA,NA.RAvAb";A' " " A
AND: , V 0_
SRI.H.C.SHIVARAMU;,]ViEMBER__ A
Miscellaneous First 'AQQQI¢"EI_ [ 20v(')"4"x
_L._¢_)k Agalat E60.-13.56/g09'3__ _
BETWEEN: I
SRI.H.M.GIRISH S/O.MANJAPPAG_OwDA., ._ ~ ' «
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, RESIDING AT~NO.10_/9, __» if .
ITI COLONY, KATHRIGUPPE MAIN"-RO.AD,"-,j;--.._ '_ '
OPPOSITE REDSON BAR &..RE'S.TAURANT,_ j ' I
BSK 3" STAGE, BANGAIIOR'E.--s5';*::;:_. .. APPELLANT
(BY SR1. K.T.C§'11F{U_DEVA ~P'RAsAD,,:THV,.R.sATHvAPAL, ADVOCATES)
AND: I A I
1. THE ORIENTAL1i'JSURANCE.C.Q...LTD.,
. YA"E'i~!IRA3 MUTT BUILDING,
'r»IO..:t99,.. 15* FLOOR, NEAR 1 1?" CROSS,
SAMPI'GE 'ROAD, :~IALI,E';IwARAM,
BANGAi;f_)RE '--= 3';..REPRESENTED BY
ITS DI'./IS'iONALF~1AN:'#LGER.
2.77', S--RI.MANjEsH'I<UNARI,
._. S_/QCHANDRA GOWDA,
_ " A .M'HAJOP,; 010.1185/A, 2"" PHASE,
,_1"7§STAGE,,CHANDRA LAYOUT, .
VIJAYA:\'A(3AR, BANGALORE -10. .. RESPONDENTS
V’ §(BY SR1. K.suREsI+, ADV.FOR R-1, M.D.ALAXANDER,
” I~|.D1N£sn SHETTY FOR R»-2)
_ FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AwARD
DATED 10-10-2003 PASSED IN MVC NO.—-I609/2001 ON THE FILE OF THE MEMBER,
MACT: IV ADDLJUDGE, BANGALORE (SCCH N0.’6), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
2
THIS APPEH. COMING OR FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOX ADAEAT AFTER
EEIMG REFERREO VIDE ORDER -BA’-{E9 26-8-20$, THE FOLLOWING ORDER IS
PASSEB.
B
The learned counse! for the eppeflent and the iearnefigounsd
for rapondent –Insurance Company atone with the
are present.
2. After due delibeetions, the mettt§c§’»AA»ise_
ha agreed ta recdve and the reiea,:>9ndenL’rw-. Insereeee
has egrad ta pay a global compehhéefien (Rupew
Ninety Thoueand’onIy),_ whichiie. ih addition to
the amount full and fined settlement of»
the claim. A jei:-ye ‘en behalf of the parties ta this
effect.
i.
3. – Iheerance Company has agreed he dwit
xthe seid 6 weeks frem the date cf preeerwon sf
TV ‘fl$efe:v_3, failing vs:ihic§£9’i’ the eeid awe nt shah carry inwmt at 9% p.a.
‘ d.a_t.e. ehdefe-nit, km the date of deposit.
Z ear’ the enhancw compmeetien amount, 50% of the
.a_;na1eh£’éhail be kw: in fixed deposit in the name of the appdlent in
..”‘.eh3¢whlafienalized Bank for a period of 3 years with the libwty to
we
K
draw the intermt on the said amount. The balance 50% of the
amcunt shall be reieasad in favour of the appellant.
.{}3 (;,*:«_£’§,{‘4§’i.,<..?t"'z_,§E_ u ;_
5. This misceilaneous first appeal — ‘_v£_i r:L.te4.f’r_i:s”v9f
‘B5! _ _._;’
the Joint Mama. The award of the Tribunal
accordingly, Draw up the Award acc;ordi:;i§:§y?”.-A.A_V A”
'A » RR