Sri Abdul Rahim Magdum Husen … vs Smt Chaya on 24 June, 2008

1:: THE HIGH COURT or KARRATAIEA AT 

DATED THIS arm 24"' mm: 05' JUNE, 200$'

THE

THE

EOE'BLE MR.

PRESENT   -

JUSTICE
AND '

 _ _   TA

acmssns ms.  

R.F.A..No.1,832  .2100:-.FA_

BE?WEER:

1 SRI

occ  _  
R/93' smm;  ¢
TQ AND may  

_,2  V
" "aw/c:. 

 j. T. §1_'or,_JsE.éIo:I;p womc
  
TQ.__&mv.DIS}"T 

 ; .  3  MASJBER _A ismmw
* Jmzgn "

..»;;;_. '§«.«.v:§: srmsmmz
mama

rammma SAID
MAJUR

.v1 _ 

6 LHEHER QHDAM
MIEDR

AE§ELLAfiEF3k$Di§ARE

  ii   SI-IAYANNAVAR

 



THE CHILDREN OF mnumaaxumz   

ALL R/AT SANTI EASTWAB
TQ AND DIST BELGAUM
APPELLANT 6, AGE MINOR, Ci£3C:HIL '
REF. BY NATURAL 2-sommz   "
sm nmxmx, *
R/A3' SANTI B@.S'IT-JAB

'i'Q AND DIST  

(By S121 ; c R   V' "

W/0 isxvmifim' 
mm  _62. "¥R&_  " _
occ AGI;§ICL}LT0ER:EA'Afifl_b"HCUSEH0LD WORK
R/AT HOU~$E-1~I0.~_1  
 _  vmaacn
   ..... 

” ” RESPONDENT

& c.v. LA ,

” . cc:>t::.~zsm.’* FOR ‘ Ci,/FLESPONDENT}

‘ram Era. FILED U/SEC.96 02′ cm A.GkI’NS’1′

AND mama DT.21.3.200′? msszaan IN

=_’=Q.Vs’;Hc;3.456{2oo5 on ‘rm FILE or Tim 1: ADDL.

C’f.E.V’£L”–JUDGE (snnm, aanaauu, mcaszzua was
‘ $612302 spzcxmc r or coxmancrr.

This apyeal coming on for adission this

~day, HENJUHATH, J, delivered the fallowing:

4. In View of the afor:e:f3ai«€30A_Q/*-.__
Executing Court, fai3._,;i. ng 1.529;’-_3
are at liberty to gxecuteci
througlu the V’ V ‘V

5 . In arrived. at
between i:.hr_ ” is disposed
of. refund half of

the court _