High Court Kerala High Court

Xavier Willium vs Convener on 13 November, 2008

Kerala High Court
Xavier Willium vs Convener on 13 November, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 31405 of 2008(L)


1. XAVIER WILLIUM, VAREKKAT HOUSE
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. CONVENER, KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS
                       ...       Respondent

2. KERALA HEAD LOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD

3. SECRETARY, INTUC AROOR UNIT

4. SECRETARY, CITU AROOR UNIT,

5. SECRETARY, AITUC AROOR UNIT

6. SECRETARY, BMS AROOR UNIT, AROOR PO.,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.V.PAULOSE

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :13/11/2008

 O R D E R
                        V.GIRI, J
                      -------------------
                  W.P.(C).31405/2008
                      --------------------
      Dated this the 13th day of November, 2008

                      JUDGMENT

Petitioner is the partner of an establishment

which functions in the Industrial Estate at Aroor,

Alappuzha. Petitioner’s firm handles hundreds of

barrels of chemicals every week and the loading and

unloading of the consignment is being done by the

head load workers registered with respondents 3 to 5.

Petitioner’s complaint is regarding the excessive

charges being collected by the Unions over and above

the rates which are approved by the Head load

Workers Welfare Fund Board. Reference is made in

the writ petition to Ext.P1 list of wages prevailing from

7.11.2006.

2. On instructions, learned Standing Counsel for

the Board submits that the rates have been revised

with effect from 11.7.2008. Counsel for the petitioner

is justified in submitting that the Unions shall not be

permitted to collect any rate in excess of what is

W.P.(C).31405/2008
2

permitted by the Board and this would apply both in

relation to the rates prescribed under Ext.P1 and the

revised rates as such.

3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing

respondents 1 and 2 to see that the rates which are

prescribed by the Board, for loading and unloading of

materials is strictly enforced and no Union is permitted

to collect any charges in excess thereof. I make it clear

that the requirement to adhere to the prescribed rates

will apply both in cases where Board collects the amount

and disburses it to the Unions or in cases where Unions

themselves collect the amount from the employers.

V.GIRI,
Judge

mrcs