Gujarat High Court High Court

Commissioner vs Unknown on 9 March, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Commissioner vs Unknown on 9 March, 2010
Author: D.A.Mehta,&Nbsp;Honourable Ms.Justice H.N.Devani,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

TAXAP/321/2009	 1/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

TAX
APPEAL No. 321 of 2009
 

 
 
=========================================


 

COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX-I - Appellant(s)
 

Versus
 

ASSOCIATED
DYESTUFF PVT LTD - Opponent(s)
 

========================================= 
Appearance
: 
MR MANISH R
BHATT, SR. STANDING COUNSEL with MRS MAUNA M BHATT
for Appellant(s) : 1, 
None
for Opponent(s) : 1, 
=========================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR. JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

                              and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MS. JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 09/03/2010 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per :

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA)

1. Heard
learned senior Standing Counsel for appellant Revenue. The
impugned order of Tribunal has been assailed by the appellant
principally on the ground that the liability in question has not
accrued during the year under consideration.

2. On
going through the order of the Tribunal as well as orders of the
subordinate authority, it is not possible to ascertain what are the
facts on the basis of which the loss/gain referred to by the
Assessing Officer arise from which transaction.

3. The
Court is prima facie of the view that in the circumstances it would
not be possible to either raise the question as proposed or answer
the same in absence of basic facts and hence, the matter is required
to be restored to the file of the Tribunal for recording basic facts.
Hence, notice returnable on 30th March, 2010.

(
D.A. Mehta, J. )

(
Harsha Devani, J. )

hkis

   

Top