High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri.Naga @ Nagaraja S/O Obalappa vs State Of Karnataka By The Kunigal on 22 April, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri.Naga @ Nagaraja S/O Obalappa vs State Of Karnataka By The Kunigal on 22 April, 2009
Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala


—-rw » ‘wmw murmur Vuvw

a….,….,.m…m… ‘.f.,g..»3w W mmmmm mm” «mum ur mmwmm man C902? 01:: KARNATAKA E-HGH ccmum CW mmmnm 1-«WM 0

CI
1’3

IN THE’ HIGH COURT OF ICARNATAKA AT BAN&ALORi»’

mzwa 2325 mm’ 22″‘ my 9:’ AERIE» 20o$..V’_’»-.:_:’..V_

BEFORE

rem HGN*’.BL£’ 13R.J£}3’2″1’CE j

Crl .1». No. 1256/éaosy .% T? ‘

BETTYEEN

Sm: Nasa 5 msamaaa –

5/0 OBALAPPA _ % ‘

AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS %

R/AT N<3.'?,-.2" 2¢m::n«:.o'Ap~._ L% «V

5" cacss,
VIJPsYPx!{A§'5A£§;" . 4 2 ya
aA::GALt3ng_a:;6"t3–.._c:44'oijj;._"-._ _. . . mrxrrozm.

'(fly –S{;r.'_vi fr-I ADV. . 3

,$§:A'::.=: as

-sf KUIJIG-.fi’.’£’;; ‘POLICE

1% j.:fb*2»mr;:._r;«:sTR1cT asspaunmrr

“”:;:iil§3f__§;’:i” A v Rammxmzm, I-ICGP}

CR.’L_.F FILED II,»’s.a39 cn.p.c BY THE

my. ‘rm PETITIQNEB. Pnmnse ‘I’£B’a.’1’ ms

z~m?_m;:: comm M: an PZLEASED 13:: mass HIHGH
gar; Ix cum m.33i2oo9 {IF mrmsm woman,
szsmmr, can rm mm or mm arms,
um-mm nzsmrcr, Em zm osrmcg

PRINCIPAL ssssmns JUDGE AT Tvmxux, msmssan
mm 312.11. wrxrxms on 9.3.2009 m
CF.L.PIISC.208, 212., 212, 223 s 26’u’2oa9.

u-rmawrw

wa’I~:::rmuI=wars W3 awflmhuriflffliwfl $”‘!fllE\e7fl1 ‘air flflfllgfigfiflfififi 335%,” ¢

H

THXS PETITION CQIHNG ON FOR GRDERS EH15
BAY, ‘THE COURT MADE ‘IKE FGI.I..OIIiINGr:

t’.3.R.D.E.R

The petitionex!accused”WNh,1 ;fi C#ime :

Eo.33f3909 of Kunigal Eolice $£a§fio# i§*bef%£§

this “Court under Sactififiy 4392 bf yf£;§}¢.,
washing bail for th$,9f£éfi¢¢§ fiagiafiéblé under
Sections 143, 147, ié3;’357′;§a§5Q:th Section

149 of IPc.§.5

2.’ ____ _Lfigfink§;’¢¢fi@fieig f§r the petitiener
submit: tha£”aag§a¢d}R¢$;4, 8 and 9 have been

xe1eaaed=9:§a:§fhgf§£$ex dated 26.3.2009 in

_’c:1,E}Eca.1oé5fébo§ c/w. 1046/2009. Ha xuxthex

* $fihmitai $h§t there is as avextawt by the

§£d§$fif p9fiiEione§, and far the alleged

V.injfi£ia§ “inflicted by accused Nb.1, the

u §£c$gn£”petitiafier is nat responsible.

3. Leaxnad HEGP submits that the

4 injuxed Manjunath suatained in all fiva

injuries including internal injuries and amall

bowwl parferation at 8 sides caused by accusad

aw:

. ..Wm W Mmmmm rmwrl …V_.wu W Mmmum mm mew.» W aamemmmm mam cmm OF mammm HIGH mum M mmA’m<A mm: c:

H:

every second Saturday afi every month till
disposal of the case;

iii) that the petitianer shall not tamper ei£h5gjf: ‘

the promoautian witnesses;

xv: that thfl Petitianar shali, at:§na “§hs”f%w*-

Court .’£’.20g”E1lv&1′.’lY .

ap’ N'< RfQ& ….