WP8779.fl8
III mm HIGH courrr or mnngrmm
cmcurr amen A1' nmmwm
DATED mrs mm am DAY our AUGUST. [I ' H
nsronn M
mm Hozrnm MR.JU8TICE "
wnrr pmrrzore xo.s779(2oos:§n5#m--ciéq ~ = V'
Between:
S1i.Ajma1 Mohammad I1iyas'_Bhagvéan__.V .. . A'
Ag-326 years, Occ:Business,'" ' R_ E }
R/0 Chimgaonkar Galli, Nipani; _ A
Tal:Chikodi. V ~
1. Sri.I-iaji Sameniifiiiétji Bagwan,
Age: Ocitzflusificsg,
R/0 Chixngaonkar'f}a!Ji,"ipani,
'I'a1:Chikotii. - a
'_ Di1Ish_adbiAAJaimM1}.'Bagwan,
Age: 5'5'3re"az1s, C}cc:Houschold work,
» ,R»;..o Galli, Nipani,
msmmmnm
-- Riindhol, Adv)
Thisgwgfinton is filed under articles 225 am: 227 of the
.1 VC'r,§12.si:itu.1;§on of India praying to quash the impugned order vide
by the court of Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) Nipani on
A" LA-.NO.9 'in O.S.No.156/2007 dt. 13.05.2003 being iflcgal and
H 'againsét iaw, the application. I.A..No.9 filed by the petitioner be
VT . V __ and etc.,
2*:/AW
Wi'87'79.08
2
This pefiiion coming on for oniers, this day, the Court
made the following:
_§..§1.'3..D§..F..{
1. The respondents have filed IA--I] 2008 for V K
writ petition.
2. At the request of petitioner’s ._t1:1e
adjoumed to today to enable him to $ub;§§j,s=,§~.ions.” ”
is not present in the court today.
3. This writ petition by the order.
dated 13.33′;26a3j;pn”‘ii;41x”ig–3o.s;%1\zc;.3ie5/2007 rejecting the
applicationioof thg’ for appointment of the
Commissioner. L 2 _V
” the respondents submits that the
wiit. “i3otrn1aintaiaable in vmr of the fact that the
the schedule property by virtue of 5:
~ deed dated 31.03.2003 and handed over the
of the property in fiavour of the purchasem.
H the petition has been filed by the petifimner afier the
deed is efibcted and that byvirtue ofthe said sale deed,
Q€z..~–~
WI’8′?79.G8
the suit filed by the petitioner itselfis not maimainame.
produced the Extract Form of the Property
with a memo dated 25.08.2008 11) ‘M
therefore prays that this writ
exemplary costs.
5. In View of the sale deed th e he has
no locus standi to norHt<V) maintain
the application bcfozt: this writ
Pfitition is
6. Having, pctimncr is directed
to pay coéigs of $5 Registrar, High Court of
Karnataka and’ a cfiect before the trial’ Court.
;_’j’77.’ tg~,-:51 to proceed with the suit in
V V8, Officc séhd a copy of this order to the petitioner.
sdl*
Judge