High Court Kerala High Court

A.Shajeer vs State Of Kerala on 9 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
A.Shajeer vs State Of Kerala on 9 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 30719 of 2009(H)


1. A.SHAJEER, S/O. ABDUL SALAM,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.A.AHAMMED

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :09/11/2009

 O R D E R
               T.R RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J.
                       -------------------------
                  W.P ( C) No.30719 of 2009
                      --------------------------
             Dated this the 9th November,2009

                        J U D G M E N T

The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction

to the respondent to consider Ext.P6 application and

appoint the petitioner under the compassionate scheme, as

a teacher.

2. Petitioner is the son of late Jubaira Beevi who

died in harness on 12.5.2007 in a motor accident. She had

been working as a Junior Arabic Teacher in Government

T.T.I Manacaud in Thiruvananthapuram. As on the date of

her death, she had put in a total service of 31 years 4

months and 17 days.

3. Apart from the petitioner, she had one daughter

Shajina, another son Shameer and husband Abdul Salam

as the legal heirs. Petitioner had acquired the

qualification in Islamic History from the University of

Kerala and has also admitted to the Degree of Master of.

Philosophy and Bachelor of Education. According to the

petitioner, he was fully dependent of the deceased mother

and therefore he is eligible under the scheme for

W.P ( C) No.30719 of 2009
2

compassionate appointment as provided in G.O (P)

No.12/99/P&ARD dated 24.5.1999.

4. Ext.P6 is the application submitted by the

petitioner. It is accompanied by various documents which

have been prescribed in the above Government Order.

5. The application submitted by the petitioner as

per Ext.P6 is kept without passing any order so far. It is

the case of the petitioner that respondent is keeping the

application pending on the ground that the petitioner is

married. It is submitted that the petitioner’s marriage is

only after the death of his mother. Reliance is placed on

the decisions of this Court in Rev.Mother Dephine Mary Vs.

State of Kerala [2002 (1) KLT 137], St.Ignatius High School

Vs. State of Kerala[2005 (3) KLT 1000] and the decision of

the learned Single Judge in Ashkarali Vs. State of Kerala

[2009 (1) KLT S.N 17) to contend for the position that the

marriage will not deprive the claim for appointment under

the compassionate scheme.

6. It is for the respondent to take a decision in

accordance with law and in accordance with the principles

W.P ( C) No.30719 of 2009
3

laid down by this Court in the above decisions.

7. Heard learned Government Pleader also. It is

submitted that final orders will be passed on Ext.P6, in

accordance with law.

Hence there will be a direction to the respondent to

take a decision on Ext.P6, in accordance with law, within a

period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of

this judgment. Petitioner will produce a copy of the writ

petition along with copy of this judgment before the

respondent, for compliance.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

T.R RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,
JUDGE

ma

W.P ( C) No.30719 of 2009
4

W.P ( C) No.30719 of 2009
5