IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 32287 of 2009(E)
1. ANZAL AZAD,S/O.AZAD,AZAD MANZIL,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE VELINELLOOR PANCHAYATH,REPRESENTED
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
Dated :12/11/2009
O R D E R
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
--------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No. 32287 OF 2009
--------------------------------------
Dated this the 12th day of November, 2009
J U D G M E N T
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The petitioner complained that the respondent Panchayat is
carrying out certain constructions in a manner that it blocks free flow
of water through the channel (cana). The plea of the petitioner is
that there was a large pond on the southern side of his property and
the water from the road and the market flow through the channel to
the pond and further flow towards the paddy land on the east. He
states that, some time ago, the respondent Panchayat filled up the
pond and purchased some property on the western side of the
channel. Alleging that the respondent is busy in making construction
of a bus stand, the writ petitioner wants that this Writ Petition to be
entertained and orders to be issued compelling the respondent to
acts on Ext.P1 representation dated 16.10.2009. The petitioner, if at
all aggrieved, has different other remedies. At any rate, it is not for
this Court to ascertain and adjudicate on the facts stated above, in
writ jurisdiction. The petitioner also does not show any reason why
the Writ Petition should be entertained ignoring other civil remedies
W.P.(C) No.32287/2009 2
that may be available to him. The Writ Petition fails and the same is
accordingly dismissed.
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN,
Judge
ps