IN THE HIGH coum or KARNATAKA AT
omen 11-415 THE 11*" my kk
BEFORE X T
me HON'BLE MRJUSTICE snamawgséegbfin
WRIT §T1TIo:~:_::3Q_,1*§_i;1%6%»fiE_ 2oo7 (g;.3_)%
BETWEEN:
Basavarajappa " _
Sfo late Ran-gag-32;; Akadha: V' '
Agcfisycazrsj' .3 » '
R/0 . » "
'I'a53.u.isi_ 7'; ' _ .
{)avan%éV1e Distxitéif-_» ._ ' - "Petitioner
(By Sri Mahesp-R U'ppin; J
\V AND :3 .5
'Cpmmissioncr
L flavaaagcm.
2. '§'1$é"AssV¢is{'a%:a.¥;3;_}ix=m3tor of Land Records
Davam§ge:?c.--'~'Division, Dazvanagexe.
% " siddaippé
.. Si' 1:-._Basapj:m
Rloficlalagcm Villagc
Basavapattanna Habli
Taiuk
Davanagem District.
.5.
petitioner as well as respondent No.3. After ~ V.
years, the second respondent has changed
numbers by passing the order
any valid reason. If at all, the liesponfiieilit ‘V
pmperty bearing he’ Whave
approached the Civil The
well settled possession_p_f»?’ not have
been disturbeci
°th’at to the petitioner, he
was met. fzeerd »..§:natt.er before the second
respo;1<i1ent "e:1_:d vt.haf=_ observations made by the
V' the parties have censented for
survey numbers is false. No
. docufhfime' produced by the learned Gevemment
Zte deny the said contentions. The third
fmsp=c-:ident though served with notice, has remained
abeent in this Writ petitien. In this View ef the matter,
\/3
_ 'old 1S'st:L . 2
.5.
the contention of the petitioner has to be
Accordingly, the following order is made:- . ” M
The order dated 7.3.2002 by-mg
respondent vide A1mexurc¥C,… ‘
16.4.2007 passed by vide
Armexu:re–F, are set to the
secand respon’d«r:;1t I’; V.”.A..VcVt:§§i:i;:s*}i§.1eration in
accordance
Pé.§iti<_m1 ié'v–é*.si:.ws9s~;b1:'a_far3cordingly.
Sd/1-E
_____ W." Iudg_~é-