High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Randhir Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 21 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Randhir Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 21 September, 2011
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                    Cr.Misc. No.28688 of 2011
                                   Randhir Singh son of Bhola Singh
                                                 Versus
                                         The State Of Bihar
                                               -----------

2. 21.9.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case

registered under Sections 341, 323, 354, 37, 506 of the Indian

Penal Code and 3(x) of the SC/ST Act.

Considering that there is a counter version of the

same occurrence and there is a land dispute between the

parties, let the petitioner above named be released on

anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the

learned court below within a period of 12 weeks from today in

connection with Pupri P.S. case No.35 of 2011 on furnishing

bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of

the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional

Judicial Magistrate, Pupri at Sitamarhi, subject to the

conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of

Criminal Procedure as also conditions (i) That one of the

bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an

affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the

petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to

the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)

That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an

accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be
-2-

released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on

affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner

is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his

release in the present case and thereafter the court below will

be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail

on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given

date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to

do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner,

his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v)

That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to

be cancelled.

Narendra/                        ( Anjana Prakash, J. )