, :;- . _" 'i3angaId1G 00 1,
" Rep.b}: its Manager.
. ( '-3: K. Vasanth, Adv. for R2)
N This Misc. First Appeal is filed under Sectimtx 173(1) of
M.V.Act against the judgment and awarci cit. 16.11.20()'?' passed
-3-
?
EN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY 9? NOVEMBER 2088
BEFORE
THE HOPPBLE MRJUSTICE SUBHASH 8.A1j{i "
mscsL1...a.uEous mas? APPEAL:_!i6.'3fl3 V
BETWEEN: %
Sri. Jagaanath
S/o. Lakehmana,
Aged about 33 years,
Rczsidixig at.
Bhammcnahzflfi Village, ,
Chitra.d1u'ga'I'aiuI«r8s I3ist.rict. " _ i '*f_'.»._3\PPELLANT
(By 531%. N. Gopa1a1(1ff.31;'a3/§§;*Ad';;f.)g
1. Sn". R. n*n"'a%":a na;~a't_j
S/o. Ra'.:1gap3;aa,,"
Major by"agé,_ '
Residing ::--1'i<,_ , ,
1{0tta1cra11atii_V1I1a,ge_, ' *
Piiali }_?"uait, Hi1*iy11.ur7T'a}uk',
. A1chitV:a:iu:ga Dishibt... _____ .. »
2. _V'i"hc' Ozientai 'Insurance
Regional 0' Vj<Lfe:ANo. I44] 145,
v Lee Shoppizxgflomplex,
-- M. G.ieoa'cI, '
.. RESPONDENTS
in MVC 350.369/20f)? on the file of XIII Additional $111311 Cause:
-2-
%
Judge 85 Member, MACT, Bangalore, SCTCH-15, partly aiicwiug
the ciaim petition for compensation and seeking enhancemergt ofs
compensation. I ”
This Appeal coming on for admission this V.
delivered the following:
This is an appeal hy the cia1’mant,;”sce’§¢_ing¥
conzpensation ix’; respect of “j1i”e3¢’zm$<°:zit- in " V
M.V.C.No.369/2007 datad 1:53' f'fov_¢§ $f¥3:<:r'v._f;.'O{}.'7." file of
MAUI'. . Bangalore.
:2. The claimagu. éffafs nf the road near
R.K.Naid11’s I{A-16/’I’-3953/ 2954
came in a rash. jdashed against him, as
a xtsult of wlifiickk fgzistaisgxed gxtievous injury, he
was’ taken to BVé1;sTa1fcs§V1115Ia$i’1Ve;,§:” igibfipimi, Chitradurga Where hf:
{lI}£1f3I\E’€Il§.5< fixation. £9 reduce the fractuni.
about F.'s.1.00.0()O/- towards medicai
ex1)e1}i§es"é:g;{i he was awning Rs.6,GOO/- by worldng
1;- éVs' V:-.z_ masofi '¥'§t;§<:§ fiibunal held that the accident was due to rash
' 1fl§.€g1i.gcnt""'c?;:iving of the tractor and 3130 held that the
" ' « . –{3é=mpan3r is liable.
‘V ‘ A» ” As mgaxd to the ccmpcnsation, the Tribune} relying on
– wound certificate, EXP? —- discharge summary feund that
1
,,§«~%:;*i««»
-5-
é
the 321111′: diszwzbriiity, aha cLa~1i1nant is €I1¥;ifl§3(i for cempensaticm on
libs 11r::ad af 1035 of ftxture income, which wotlld some it;
R3.’f.2,13,,112{)/–.
‘7. Ensafar as loss -.:;=f zxmcnities is concémefi, thé
having noticed “tilt: in} uries and its effect an thé.;vI§.£3T1e’:bS_€;£.amér:i,tics “3352.
on the lawer side. The same is enlxafiéed ~ i./’
.5>x « ‘ 3$:?3$/”\/ V iorrflstéd
Accmtiingiy, {he claimant is sntitlesi .5015:x:.s{?9;.3;9Q;’:_ovm~ and V,’
Bt.?§.12.Bfi
above the <1:-zxmpensation aw;-mled V€£1c*§'V'I'ri~b';:¢;§:s§1..5.sIi:1i£iv.viigzterest at
6% per on thej:if§11a§ié¢ci.v<f{3ni;}énsz§tio:£i the date caf
petition till payrncznt. V 5..
with this f)a11;ly allowed.
u Sdfud
%%%%% Judgg