High Court Kerala High Court

V.C.Radhakrishnan vs The Kerala Water Authority on 20 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
V.C.Radhakrishnan vs The Kerala Water Authority on 20 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA.No. 2571 of 2009()


1. V.C.RADHAKRISHNAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE KERALA WATER AUTHORITY,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE LABOUR COURT,KOZHIKODE.

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.K.JAYAKUMAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.S.R.BANNURMATH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

 Dated :20/11/2009

 O R D E R
              S.R.Bannurmath, C.J. & A.K. Basheer, J.
                 ------------------------------------------
                      W.A.No.2571 of 2009 &
                   C.M.Appln.No.1204 of 2009
                 ------------------------------------------
             Dated this the 20th day of November, 2009

                            JUDGMENT

A.K.Basheer, J.

This application is filed under Section 5 of the

Limitation Act praying to condone the delay of 1039 days in filing

the writ appeal.

2. We have perused the averments made by the

applicant in the affidavit filed in support of the application. It is

admitted by him that his services as pump operator were not

regularised and he was terminated from service by the Kerala Water

Authority on August 1, 1987. However, he came to know later that

services of some similarly placed employees were regularised

pursuant to the judgment in O.P.No.12300 of 1998. According to

the deponent, he was undergoing Ayurvedic treatment for certain

injuries sustained by him due to a fall from a building. He further

submits that he had approached the High Court Legal Services

Committee seeking assistance.

3. Having carefully perused the various averments made

in the affidavit, we are not at all satisfied that the inordinate delay of

1039 days in filing the appeal can be condoned, especially since

there is absolutely no satisfactory explanation. Therefore, the

application is dismissed.

Consequently, the writ appeal is also dismissed.

S.R.Bannurmath,
Chief Justice

A.K. Basheer,
Judge

vns