Shanthi Homes Private Limited vs S K Screwvala on 26 March, 2008

1 CRLP. NO. 3701 IIWI

IN THE HIGH counr an xnnunmnxn AT annaaxons
nmun THIS mm 25" mm or MARCH 2003

BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JU3TICE N. hNfiNDA

CRI...F. rm. 3'7"E"JiI'2*fJt"J2M

BETWEEN :

1

ms 51-um-.t'H:t HOMES PIi.IVATE' Lmxrmnk'
2.99, mm: .?.I;t..?.K, as 2:»;   % V
vx:t'1':u. HRLLY1-'m an, B"LORE .

E? E3' Cfimfifififififiz-'

ct-mmsmsamzm RAJU ._  .
ma, '.n.w_':..m~: .I.=::_1.21t:;.§  V
v:s:*1:'rz=-.14 m=a.L:tA, an 

1': 1:      
sun *ra.%rsE:V%P;1#j:Ln1;aa3Lr:~.p;1~ # "ism"
EDEN mmvx, .# %::%c3V,.__ vI&"f£?¥5zL__ MALLYA an

1: 'I 'rfi1!I1'.:'|
5! um.-n.u

FETTTI'Hfififi

[£!y'~S;:*i ADVJEOPL sax. c: v NAGEBI-I)

AND '

9.
I'.

SIG S=K K SCREWHRLA

 u ;
"-f'--«I?,.-'";':t,# es»-A

 r-.nm'n~=":'-.=9\n'u"a
._ -..«.uA..n- u. naun

 .._ "3aCtIa?7BRY

Tnmmaax man: an

... RESPDNDENT



2. ORLF. NO. 37015001

[By Sari: B K SAMPA , 

CI'LL.E' FILED U.r'S.432 c11.y.c at THE ADVOCATE FOR
THE vmrxrxonms PEI-WING mm THIS .HON'BLE COURT'
L-LA': 1.2.3 ELEIHSEIJ To 3131" ASIDE THE ORDER D'1'. a.4,2%oq2..,_
PASSED BY TI-IE XTI-I ADDL. c.1«-1.151., BANGALORE c;;f:.**.z 'm. 
ma rm. lfiww rm';-u* }u"«..-'1'-IBERED as c.c.1~w. 2251539';-«.»V%'V--~%  '

TI-IIS ~::R1..mrITxoN COMING on FOP. §'WFLii.'= <3 "  

ms mm, T1-m COIIRT 2-mos: ma: FOLLOWIIQG-«:A_  ,   
own  %

The petitioners arreiytgd 'eai  f':.&c$'-.-.91". 1" to 3
in C.1':'..Na.22616r' 99 penn?;3.Vn«¢'V_ " offences
punishable under    V'  filed
this patitinn   V:a:t.:"<§s:c=a.£adin:gs pending

-F-'In.nv-Q 4 1'1
\rJ.s.vJ..va...u.n

2. '.I'h_e_ 1.t§"&a-:;iec1V'v--.I-ia:.gi'~:§Li:::ate ttzsuk cognizance,

xar,:'ia':~:fi.»ad Vvstatémfiat' of complairmnt and issued

pro-:: e*'~:,;;s"' ::t1:;'e:.4'ޢ'L;used. Against tha said order:

  ;5a t:,:i.t: _ .' in borders this court in

--43.;-;J:.4.4'E*g.1%.1e='.Z';9.:2%.-"9. This ceurt fear-4 'cue erde:-.: ef

2

V   V. _  zarme was totally mechanical .

 tbs matter was remitted back to learned

1 A
W'  'H= .5



fiJJml3NLflW3

Hagistrata to apply his mind and pass appropriate

orders in tarma nf Chapter XV. Theraaftnr, learngd

my "WV

and reggrdad éflérfi,

saifiV;"

order was challenged in Crl.P.Nbg2592f2OUi;fqTfiifi f

caurt noticing the ardar was §reyl£c&.r&f' fih9'rr

earlier order, set aaide the hang ard romi§fi§d,;flev%

matter back to learned Hggistrfitfi wrtfi a rpafiific

I31.

0:
ireerren

'....-....;-_

éfiérfi

Ht

ciéfit groumd to

exiatance er orh§rwifia~ir§£z$u£ii
procead. Th§:pa£fici%;9arn§fi*fi§giétrata has passed

thy impugnefi,urd§rf.<r'r 

 ka.

petiti¢naua_anfiriaarnad counsel for réapahdént.

v.5. 'Thar 'I§arn9d. counsel for petitiunera

  *ma»_.4_t:rir:augh avarmants or camplaint and sworn

Wwffi rrarar§m$h£"find documenta filad along with complaint



r,j~_"'».'V_g;g§efi§n£w$.E'1}?a-n. cheques were next honoured.

J C'.RL..'F.ND. 370131111

considered the worn statement and complaint.

 the learned counsel for respondent 

..-_L…l ,.i3…… LL; £………….–_.l .-…–J.—-
uni:-J.J..’.’f b.l…!. LLUEUQIJVVI UJ-‘Ll L-

J.

J

T. In the sworn at-atamant,:’.__
atated that patiticner 21¢!-E*:._.2.._V 3
Dire-c1:»c:-rs r:-f tirst petitioner

Qffarad. certain

way –

of    gs...    ma   5.

inn tallment aura

P.a.2,BI:I,.0C-CI.-‘-V-__ Vczhungas to the
patitianera V;1’:”~*.=.eca_%iL1:rjt”‘vr.b_’uj-:v5t’«’E..I5-executed. During the
year 1996 raajgaérdant ‘&ppr’6;-flared petitioner nos. 2

tr s=::’m-~ +.-2~e’=

arm-v1~

3
1
5w

fir-Vdj act was mt approved. When
1,°§aj:<:-nds1i'f;' daria-xiéied petitioner: to pay bar}: money,

ix'-'c3.3..2 amzi 3 issued twa cheques. On

3 CRLPJKL3WLflflfl

tha liability into loan liability and agreed to

gay interest. They did not pay any interest {us

agreed; As 5. result; reg.=g¢n_e:;1; naithmz get; 4…1,E1;.éi
pl-at rm:-1: his money. Ccan11:':.'Laif1an* has 313-: m'r';i'" a

reference to agreement dated 29.12__.,$}.'J'_g

8. In the impugned “:iV’._»’1′:dze1:,flV. fiha

Magistrate would any ihrapifosfifinted

raspendent ta sell 5: site n~.e*:9.e§.3.ri.*;r,; 10090 sq ft;
fox R3.17,5|3,C’CIfJ!” __ 1;e.i§1’a:;nt paid

Rs . 5. -as .. cow- fin-vi: 1; ugavance. But
the p-mtir:ic;{1a.;1:v.sA””V..%i’.i.i§:,:’_ ‘their promise.
Imstead thefif -for the said aum.

Cheques $:aa1:e’A”‘:uo-tv’ Therefore, learned

ennui: » i’n-.1-:1Vuc,9£.A __ primn faczie proceed against:

:::”‘;:_atiti§$nAe§:;:s ‘c§f’fenca punishable under section
pf a comparative reading cf the

e;1«}§$r£;’u».:a:tia:.Ljeuiifint and impugned nrdar I find those

fa’u,r;:’r;.a :1:-a I_1g1_: gtuteci in the sworn statement.
iafuré “p-:1:«511r;;’ tha irrrp”u.gned ardar the ‘-

6 CIILJF. NO. 3701 KIWI

Magistratsac has n-at lcukad into sworn statement.

Therefmce, petition is accepted.

‘Liza impugned order: in set: aside.

-amittad hack to the learned I£ag*iatra.e.w««.?§_#’;:.f Ag;-a–

cansisrmration frcm the stage of

atatemsent in tha light of t:.b.e.__. oh§i’¢%§’:’fi’atir;:ia;VA.

herein and in accordance with
The learned Hagiatérgfie f_:aI;é.i1.__ ‘é::<::%1§teIic1§rVA tha

._v-amennts at aomplgint =,§':#ro.i::n'°"~v§t§é.1i:c§m-ant and