High Court Kerala High Court

T.S.Sivaraman vs State Of Kerala on 19 July, 2007

Kerala High Court
T.S.Sivaraman vs State Of Kerala on 19 July, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA No. 1776 of 2007()


1. T.S.SIVARAMAN,S/O.SANKARAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE TAHSILDAR, KODUNGALLUR.

3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,

4. THE WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR,

5. N.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.AJITH KRISHNAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :19/07/2007

 O R D E R
                                H.L.DATTU, C.J.   &   K.T.SANKARAN, J.

                                          ------------------------------------------

                                                  W.A.No.1776 of 2007

                                          ------------------------------------------

                                    Dated, this the   19th    day of July,  2007


                                                  JUDGMENT

H.L.Dattu, C.J.

This writ appeal arises out of the order passed by the learned Single

Judge in W.P.(C) No.18094 of 2007 dated 18th June, 2007.

2. Aggrieved by the revenue recovery proceedings initiated by the

respondents for recovery of the amounts due under the provisions of the Kerala

Toddy Workers Welfare Fund Act, the petitioner was before the learned Single

Judge by filing the writ petition. Admittedly, the dues were for the year 1988-

89. The learned Single Judge taking all the aspects of the matter into

consideration and also the financial constraints pleaded by the petitioner has

thought it fit to direct the petitioner to pay initially an amount of Rs.12 lakhs and

pay the balance amount in six monthly equal instalments.

3. Having gone through the orders passed by the learned Single Judge,

in our opinion, the learned Judge has not committed any error whatsoever

which would call for our interference in this appeal. Therefore, the writ appeal

requires to be rejected and it is rejected.

Ordered accordingly.

(H.L.DATTU)

CHIEF JUSTICE

(K.T.SANKARAN)

JUDGE

vns