High Court Kerala High Court

New Indi Assurance Co.Ltd vs K.Muhammedkunhi on 5 December, 2007

Kerala High Court
New Indi Assurance Co.Ltd vs K.Muhammedkunhi on 5 December, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MFA No. 905 of 2001(C)



1. NEW INDI ASSURANCE CO.LTD
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. K.MUHAMMEDKUNHI
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL

                For Respondent  :SRI.T.MADHU

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.B.KOSHY
The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :05/12/2007

 O R D E R

J.B. Koshy & K.Hema, JJ.

————————————–
M.F.A.No. 905 of 2001

—————————————
Dated this the 5th day of December, 2007

Judgment

Koshy,J.

First respondent in this appeal filed an application for

compensation before the Commissioner for Workmen’s

Compensation contending that he sustained serious injuries in an

accident during the course of employment. He was aged 33 years

and was having a monthly income of Rs.2,500/-. The wound

certificate shows that he sustained the injuries as a result of the

accident. He claimed an amount of Rs.2,00,000/-. The

Commissioner calculated an amount of Rs.98,856/- with interest at

the rate of 12% from the date of accident till the date of passing the

award. Interest payable till the date was Rs.61,291/- and thus total

compensation was Rs.1,60,147/-. It is also stated that if the amount

is not deposited within the time, the claimants are also entitled to

get interest at the rate of 12% for default till deposit. Disability was

assessed at 40%. The claimant who was examined as AW1 gave

evidence that he was a driver by profession and because of the

accident, he is unable to drive and he is entitled to compensation for

M.F.A.No.905/2001 2

100% loss of earning capacity. AW2 doctor who issued the medical

certificate deposed that he had disability of 50%. He has ankylosis

of Rt. knee joint following the injury and infection. He deposed that

the disability was assessed under the McBride’s scale, but,

considering the percentage of disability of a workman, it can be

reduced to 45%. Under section 4 (1) (c) (ii) of the Workmen’s

Compensation Act, Commissioner has to assess the compensation

on the basis of the certificate issued by a qualified medical

practitioner assessing loss of earning capacity. The Commissioner

has assessed the compensation on the basis of the loss of earning

capacity assessed by the medical practitioner. Compensation

payable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act for loss of one leg

is 90%. Here, as a result of the accident, apart from the shortening

of the leg, there was mal-union and he was unable to drive.

Considering these aspects and considering the loss of earning

capacity assessed by the doctor, the Commissioner fixed 40% as the

loss of earning capacity. We see no ground to interfere in the same.

2. Commissioner has taken Rs.2000/- as the monthly

income as the maximum salary that can be taken into consideration

at the time of accident though workman was earning more at the

time of accident. Thus, compensation was calculated as follows:

M.F.A.No.905/2001 3

2000 x 60 x 40 x 205.95 = Rs.98,856/-.

100 x 100

3. We note that the Commissioner has granted 12%

interest from the date of application till the date of the award and

thereafter, again, awarded interest at the rate 12% from the total

amount including interest from the date of award till deposit. It is

true that statutory interest payable is 12% from the date of

application to the date of payment as compensation fell due when

the accident occurred as held by the Supreme Court in KSEB v.

Valsala (1999 (3) KLT 348 SC) as well as Pratap Narain Singh Deo v.

Srinivas Sabata and another (AIR 1976 SC 222) and Maghar Singh v.

Jashwant Singh ((1998) 9 SCC 134). But, Commissioner cannot add

interest upto the date of award to the compensation amount and

then direct to pay 12% interest from the total award. Here, the

Commissioner calculated compensation payable as Rs.98,856/-

which is in accordance with the provisions of the Act. Thereafter,

the Commissioner calculated interest till the date of award as

Rs.61,291/- and interest was added up and total amount awarded

was Rs.1,60,147/- and then awarded 12% interest on Rs.1,60,147/-

from the date of award till the date of deposit. This is incorrect.

This will amount to awarding interest on interest. Compensation

M.F.A.No.905/2001 4

payable will be Rs.98,856/- with 12% simple interest per annum

from the date of application till the date of deposit. Here, the

amount was deposited on 12.7.2001. The appeal is disposed of

modifying the award accordingly.

J.B.Koshy
Judge

K. Hema
Judge

vaa

M.F.A.No.905/2001 5

J.B. KOSHY AND
K.HEMA,JJ.

————————————-
M.F.A. No. 905 of 2001

————————————-

Judgment

Dated:5th December, 2007