High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Arun Kumar Gupta vs The State Of Bihar on 28 June, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Arun Kumar Gupta vs The State Of Bihar on 28 June, 2010
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Cr.Misc. No.21298 of 2010
       ARUN KUMAR GUPTA, S/o Jhakas Sah @ Jhakash Gupta.
                             Versus
                      THE STATE OF BIHAR
                            -----------

02. 28.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted

for the offences under Sections 366 and 376/34 of

the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that when the alleged

victim was recovered she gave her statement under

Section 164 Cr.P.C. explaining the manner in which

the co-accused had committed excesses upon her.

However, about the petitioner it was stated that he

being the brother of co-accused Bhim Shankar Gupta

had in fact come to her rescue and spoken for her.

In view of such, let the petitioner, above

named who is in custody since 20.01.2010 be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions

Judge, F.T.C.-V, Saharsa in connection with S.Tr. No.

68 of 2010 arising out of Sour Bazar P.S. Case No.

247 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i)
2

That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as

to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will

also undertake to inform the Court if there is any

change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the

affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not

accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be

released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on

affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar

nature after his release in the present case and

thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate

the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground

of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on

the given date and be present on date fixed for charge

and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays

the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled for reasons of misuse.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-