Gujarat High Court High Court

Sanjay vs State on 18 June, 2008

Gujarat High Court
Sanjay vs State on 18 June, 2008
Author: H.N.Devani,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCR.A/1122/2008	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 1122 of 2008
 

 
 
==========================================

SANJAY
DALMIA DIRECTOR, GHCL LIMITED & 11 – Applicant(s)

Versus

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 – Respondent(s)

=========================================

Appearance :

MR
RAKESH GUPTA with MR KUNAL NAIK for M/S TRIVEDI & GUPTA
for Applicants.

MR KP RAVAL, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
for Respondent(s) : 1,
None for Respondent(s) :

2,
==========================================

CORAM
:

HONOURABLE
MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI

Date
: 18/06/2008

ORAL
COMMON ORDER

Heard
Mr.Rakesh Gupta, learned advocate with Mr.Kunal Naik, learned
advocate for M/s Trivedi & Gupta Advocates, learned advocates
for the petitioners.

Attention
of the Court is drawn to the allegations made in the complaint to
point out that the main allegation is that the petitioners have
committed breach of the the provisions of the notification dated
14th September, 2006 issued by the Ministry of
Environment & Forests. Referring to the notification dated 14th
September, 2006, it is pointed out that the same applies only to new
projects or activities or on the expansion of modernization of
existing projects or activities based on their potential
environmental impacts. It is submitted that insofar as the Company
in question is concerned, the same has not undertaken any new
project or activities or expansion or modernization. It is
submitted that, in the circumstances, provisions of notification
dated 14th September, 2006 would not be applicable.
However, to be on the safer side, the Company has made application
under the said notification dated 14th September, 2006,
and the same is pending clearance before the concerned authority.

Considering
the submissions advanced by the learned advocate for the
petitioners, issue notice returnable on 8th
July, 2008. By way of ad-interim relief, further proceedings
pursuant to Criminal Case No.1242 of 2007 pending before the learned
Judicial Magistrate First Class, Veraval, are hereby stayed.

Mr.K.P.Raval,
learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondent No.1 ? State of Gujarat.

Direct
service is permitted qua respondent No.2.

[HARSHA
DEVANI, J.]

parmar*

   

Top