High Court Karnataka High Court

Bheemesh S/O Bheemaraya Korvar vs State Of Karnataka By Sho Of … on 4 November, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Bheemesh S/O Bheemaraya Korvar vs State Of Karnataka By Sho Of … on 4 November, 2008
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
U

.m...m-mm ruvn \..vul-H U!' KAKNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURTHOF KARNATAKA HIGH CO

_ w-....... ---1rIUl'\l' '$1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA

DA'I'E'D 'Fl-HS THE 04TH DAY 01+' NOVEMBER"   "
BEFORE .  WM# . %

THE HONBLE MR. JUS'I'ICE MOHAIV.s1€AN91'AM§}aum§§. ' V

CRL.P.No.s7 4;a-£2008   

BETWEEN:

Bheemesh V  H
S/0 Bi1eema1'aya4i§i'0I_var;_'

Age: 25 years " " ' '

Occ: Coolie 1. __   
R/0 Baidoddi  " '  
Tq. Raichzir-.» _ _  *1:  "

(By Sri K.Ap.pé1 Rag, " 

    ..... 

V Stat? bf»

By%%%%s1+1Tc;%«o1’Y’¢rag”c;r:;: Police Statian

. . .Petit:ioI1er.

.. Rcspondeilt

Sri shgfirmmbasappa K..Babsneny, HCGP)

-…….__ .. ……u……….-. mm wmu Ur mxmmm HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KAk’i§}ii’i}.xA ms:-1 com

This Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail duxting the
pendenoy of the trial in Crime No.116/2008 and

Yeragera Police Station.

C.C.No.180/2008 registered 11/5. 323 and 302. IPv<Z§_f'by*~.._

This i.7'etitio11 coming on for orders T' 1

court made the foiiowingz —

V A
Petitioner is accused in t’Jo.~ “of
Yeragera Poiiee Station: 1. an . . % the V V ‘offences
Punishable 11/3. 393 and “\~”§i”LI?’ z
This oi’ Cr.P.C.

Ibr bail. “”” » 4 ‘ 2
:2. :V*-Ttxe’ in brief is mat

the petitjonei*o«-had ‘ztiobile phone of relative of

véeeeaseét, At 4.00 PM on 15.6.2008,

uT¢’;1er§e’t11eJ%c2e¢ct.eas¢d Venkatesh and CWs.;’»3 and 3 were

t.._M_sittifig. togethei5’j__tti£king with each other, the petitioner
greet at that time the deceased asked the

to return back the mobiie phone o1’Sh1’va. At

F5

COURT OF KARNATMM HIE?! C00!!! 9!’ KARNJHAKA I-1:1.-in uuuxl Ur nnlcwnsnssa nsurn uuunu ur Mmmnimm nsun \.
I’ ‘_i ‘ Iululu vr l\f’|I£!Y£\IJ’ll\l”\ ruun uwun

that point of time quarrel ensued. CWs.2 and 3

intervened and pacified the quarrel. Again on the same

day at 6.30 PM when all the persons had gone to
Prasada in the Pooja, the petitioner picked up
with the deceased and assaulted fixefieceased» AV 1 >
steel tumbler {Leta}, which was in

on the left side temporal region,~’£;s..§t ree’u_lii of

deceased died on the spot.


3. The   reveals
that the deceasecg'     injury
over the body:   Laboratory has
opined     injury associated

with a1coho1iC.V_ii;toxiaa1ien§_’ ” -._ ” ‘ « ‘”

learned co-unsei for the

fietifieiieree that the investigation is earmpleted

‘ V’ the petitioner may not be necessary.
:v..A_e’eordi11g~ te:.him, the deceased might have fefl down on

surface due ta intoxication and might have

M

5

(3) Petitioner shat! attend the trial Court
regulariy.

(4) Petitioner shall mark his .4

before the Station House _

Yeragem Police .S’ta£ion,. _
Sunday betweerz
p. m. I

C1’im1’naI_ petition is Véicafirdingly.

~1″0;aa% ca. _m; % afid. %;2,Lc:z:{ _ J f