High Court Karnataka High Court

New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Elumalai S/O Mutte Gounder on 30 March, 2009

Karnataka High Court
New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Elumalai S/O Mutte Gounder on 30 March, 2009
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao
IN "mg HIGH comm' OF KARNATAKA, AC" BANGALORE:-.<'_:'T~.V_

BATED mxs THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH, 2£§é'9~ ;-..i 2?  _

125:"-;:';'I"4sEE~

THE ¥~{ON'Bi,iE<3 MR. JUSTICE  J 1'

R.P.NO. 1€:'z_g_ 2006.__ --

BETWEEN:--   _  
NEW INBIA AssURANc:§:'€{o.,_ALTD'.,---  V 
REP. BY THE DEPUTY MANAG;-:s:R;.,' ;  "
P. KALINGA RAD ROAE), V  :
BANGALORE.  ,   1 «V 

' ' " jPE'I'i'I'IONER

(BY SR1 R. JA_Ii?,RA1§§§$_Sf~{ Af3.3}0Qr;*§E:j V:

AN{):~  '- 3-

1.

E§LU1.VIALA§, 7i,
MA&OR,_ . * . _’
S/0.”‘AMUTTE ‘GQi§4Nr.>ER.,.n ”
NC).28, ..::«4fPH ‘MA1’-,Nj,- _ ‘*
MUNESHWARA B;LO_CEi’…,~7
P. 1~:AL.L:, MALLES’HWARAM,
£s;e:NQA1,QRE 43..- ….. <4 .

.E\dA;§CI'f?._, "

‘ ‘– As/<3. Rsgsufiéau,

:~:4o.1cv7,_étgf¥'%1 (moss,
1<:;:=§ N'; EX'I'ENSiON,
BA:~:{}_AL0RE « 2.

RV’ ES:~IW:’~&Rz%CHARI,

– MAJOR,

N0.3C3E:S, KETGNARA GUNDAIMNE
‘ GURUDAPALLI,

ANDHRAPRAD ESH.

RESFONDENTS

(BY SR} SRIPAD V. SHASTR1 FOR R1)

THEE REWEW PE’I’§’I’£ON P’iLE1£) U/O. 4?.,R’~U1,E,”:”‘ ~
cpc: PRAYING FOR REVIEW 0:: THE GRDE.R!_Ji§D{}MEH’i””
AND DEGREE BATES 05.0?.0:3 PA.S8E£3.4I1\E z»§FA.’58’;cw 2904-V_ ‘
ms: THE FILE OF THE} HONBLE _H’:a1~1_ -I<:a:J'§2tf;'VVV_ 'C92? 7

KAR NATAKA, BAN GALORE. &

This pczition coming on"f;<_:§i'~ 91136193 this €iay,"«:.£i1$.c::3urt 2 L'

made the foiiowfiing:

In the fhe graifiéié accident is
described 233. } i%§%e§ér, in the <:h.<3:rge
sheet as M? 23 D
8246. riiscrepaxicy with reference

to the veh:i.§:k: _Iii;1;1'iui§§r::'ii;:3,;t{a?eer1 FIR and charga shes':

_ n1atr3%jié};~ "I'heV"F'£Rvvbei;{1g the earliest document Carries a

Tfif€3£';£36f.. L(;';1"'.€dQ3i].if;}". Therefore, it cazmat be argued that

bearing N0. ME' 23 D 8:246 caused. "aha

acciéieytimié mat the insured vehicie baaring N0. MP 23

V' Accardingly review is dismissed.

Sd/-n
Judge