Gujarat High Court High Court

Ranubha vs State on 13 April, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Ranubha vs State on 13 April, 2011
Author: Ravi R.Tripathi,&Nbsp;Mr.Justice P.P.Bhatt,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/4915/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 4915 of 2011
 

In


 

CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 1788 of 2006
 

=================================================


 

RANUBHA
NANUBHA - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=================================================
 
Appearance
: 
THROUGH
JAIL for Applicant(s) : 1, 
Mr.KARTIK PANDYA, ADDL PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) :
2, 
=================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE P.P.BHATT
		
	

 

		
 

					Date
: 13/04/2011 

 

ORAL
ORDER

(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)

The
present application is filed, through Jail, seeking temporary bail
for a period of 60 days, for constructing the house, which has
collapsed, as stated in the application, during the last monsoon due
to incessant rains. It is also stated in the application that the
convict’s parents are residing in a hut constructed in the fields.

2. RULE.

Mr.Kartik Pandya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives
service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

3. The
applicant- appellant- original accused has been convicted for the
offences punishable under sections 302 and 498-C of the Indian Penal
Code to suffer imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.500/-, in
default to further undergo imprisonment for 1 month as awarded by
the learned Judge, Fast Track Court,
Deesa, Banaskantha in
Sessions Case No.172 of 2005.

4. The learned
APP has made available the Jail record and invited attention of the
Court to the Jail remarks. The convict had enjoyed temporary bail
once and furlough once. On each occasion the convict had reported
belatedly by one day. However, said late reporting is regularised.
Nothing adverse is noticed from the Jail remarks.

5 Taking into
consideration the contents of the application and the record of the
convict, the convict is ordered to be released on temporary
bail for 30 (thirty) days from the date of his release on his
executing a personal bond of Rs.5000/- (Rupees five thousand only) to
the satisfaction of the Jail authorities.

6. The
applicant shall surrender himself to the Jail authorities on expiry
of the above temporary bail period. The application is allowed. Rule
is made absolute.

(RAVI
R. TRIPATHI, J.)

(P.P.

BHATT, J.)

karim

   

Top