High Court Kerala High Court

Prakash vs State Of Kerala on 4 December, 2008

Kerala High Court
Prakash vs State Of Kerala on 4 December, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 4707 of 2008()


1. PRAKASH, S/O. THULASI, PARANAVAMANDIRAM
                      ...  Petitioner
2. RADHAKRISHNAN UNNITHAN,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.DILEEP P.PILLAI

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :04/12/2008

 O R D E R
                        R.BASANT, J.
                      ----------------------
                    Crl.M.C.No.4707 of 2008
                   ----------------------------------------
            Dated this the 4th day of December 2008

                              O R D E R

The petitioner faces indictment in a prosecution for

offences punishable under the Kerala Abkari Act. Investigation

is complete. Final report has already been filed. Cognizance has

been taken. Committal proceedings has been registered. The

petitioner has not entered appearance so far. He was not

arrested at the crime stage or thereafter. Reckoning him as an

absconding accused, coercive processes have been issued by the

learned Magistrate to procure his presence. He apprehends

imminent arrest in execution of such processes.

2. The petitioner has now come to this court with the

prayer that directions under Section 482 Cr.P.C may be issued to

the learned Magistrate to comply with the directions in Alice

George vs.Deputy Superintendent of Police [2003(1)KLT

339] and Sukumari v. State of Kerala [2001(1)KLT 22]) and

to consider his application for bail to be filed by him when he

surrenders before the learned Magistrate on merits, in

accordance with law and expeditiously – on the date of surrender

itself.

Crl.M.C.No.4707/08 2

3. Sufficient general directions have already been

issued in Alice George and Sukumari (Supra). It is not

necessary for this court in every subsequent case to issue

directions to the Magistracy to follow the dictum in Alice

George and Sukumari (Supra). Every court is bound to do the

same. I have no reason to assume that the same shall not be

done. If the directions are not complied with the avenues of

challenge/complaint are available for the petitioner.

4. In the result, this petition is dismissed subject to the

above specific observations.

5. Hand over copy of this order to the learned counsel

for the petitioner for production before the learned Magistrate.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
jsr

Crl.M.C.No.4707/08 3

Crl.M.C.No.4707/08 4

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.C.No. of 2008

ORDER

09/07/2008