High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Ludhiana Improvement Trust vs Land Acquisition Tribunal on 20 January, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Ludhiana Improvement Trust vs Land Acquisition Tribunal on 20 January, 2009
CWP No.1182 of 2001                                                         1

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                     CHANDIGARH

                                             CWP No.1182 of 2001
                                             Date of decision: 20.1.2009

Ludhiana Improvement Trust, Ludhiana

                                                                 ...Petitioner

                                   Versus

Land Acquisition Tribunal, Ludhiana and others.

                                                              ...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
       HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN

Present:    Mr. Rupinder Khosla, Advocate
            for the Improvement Trust.
                        -.-

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL,J. (Oral)

1. This order will dispose of four writ petitions being CWP Nos.

8575, 8576 and 8577 of 1989 and CWP No. 1182 of 2001. Three petitions

have been filed by land owners while the fourth one has been filed by

Improvement Trust arising out of the same acquisition proceedings.

2. Notification under Section 36 of the Punjab Town

Improvement Act, 1922 is dated 11.8.1972 to acquire 100 acres of land

located at Rajpura Road for Development Scheme known as “100 Acres

Development Scheme”. The Land Acquisition Collector vide award dated

20.9.1974 determined compensation ranging from Rs.75/- per biswansi to

Rs.113/- per biswanis. On reference, the Land Acquisition Tribunal

enhanced the compensation to Rs. 39 for belt A and Rs.26 for belt B. Land

owners were held entitled to enhance interest and solatium. This Court dealt

with the matter vide judgment dated 2.5.2006 in CWP No. 1599 of 1986

(Private Trust v. The Land Acquisition Tribunal, Ludhiana and
CWP No.1182 of
2001 2

others). This Court awarded flat rate of Rs.39/- per square yard holding

that the entire land had the same potentiality.

3. In view of above, petition filed by the improvement Trust is

liable to be dismissed and the petitions filed by the land owners are liable to

be allowed in terms of judgment of this Court in Private Trust’s case

(supra). We order accordingly.

4. The petitions are disposed of.




                                          (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL)
                                                JUDGE


20.1.2009                                     (JITENDRA CHAUHAN)
mk                                                 JUDGE