High Court Kerala High Court

Suma.V.G vs The State Of Kerala on 20 July, 2010

Kerala High Court
Suma.V.G vs The State Of Kerala on 20 July, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 22485 of 2010(I)


1. SUMA.V.G.,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :20/07/2010

 O R D E R
                     ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                   ================
                W.P.(C) NO. 22485 OF 2010 (I)
                =====================

             Dated this the 20th day of July, 2010

                         J U D G M E N T

Petitioner was advised and appointed as Junior Public

Health Nurse Grade II. Subsequently, PSC cancelled the advise

resulting in an order terminating the service of the petitioner.

This proceedings were challenged before this Court in OP

No.14875/01 resulting in Ext.P4 judgment directing

reconsideration of the matter. That judgment was confirmed in

WA No.700/06 filed by the petitioner. PSC reconsidered the

matter and passed Ext.P6 order upholding the cancellation of

advise. It is in these circumstances, Ext.P8 representation has

been filed by the petitioner before the 1st respondent.

2. In Ext.P8 representation, the petitioner mainly relies

on Ext.P7, where, according to the petitioner, the Government

interfered with the cancellation of the advice in respect of

similarly situated persons, invoking its power under Rule 39 of

Part I KS & SSR. In this writ petition, what the petitioner seeks

is an expeditious consideration of Ext.P8 in the light of Ext.P7

order.

WPC No. 22485/10
:2 :

3. Having regard to the above facts, I dispose of this writ

petition directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders

on Ext.P8 with notice to the petitioner and in the light of Ext.P7

order. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any

rate, within 3 months of production of a copy of this judgment.

In the meanwhile, status quo as on date shall be maintained.

Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before

respondents 1 and 2 for compliance.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp