D Subramani vs Joint Registrar Of Co-Op … on 8 December, 2009

2. THE. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF
CO»--OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,

SH] MOGA DISTRICT,

SHIMOGA.

3. 'I'm; CO~C)PERA'1'I'\/E i)EVI:TLO'PMI£N'I"
()i:'1~"'1c:}3R, m1R't't~1A}«iAt,L1 TALUK,   -
TH.iR'.['HAHALi.I 1
SHEMOGA DIS'1'RlCT.

4. "I-EAR1}ANA~GIRI]ANA KALL'U' V

S.A.HAK..AR.A. SANGHA NIYAMITH A H
M. E'§Ij..,Ii..NA KURUVAi_.L'i' VI1,I_A~QE '
T H IIR.'}"I"IA.HAl.I_.1 TALUK. ii

'R}%1SPONDENTS 5 TO 12 ARE"13E;r;E1'E:t;1"»,_ i ii

Vim: COURT O13D'E"13,_f>A'I'E_D 1 1.::'l20@9"'  «.  

V. .R.ES PONDfEi'NTS

(By SR1 1%:,N.311iW;:':iQ¢'iswAMY_, HCGP FOR R1 -3)

_ This 'w4r.%tt petiI'.i511i i7i1ti'dt. tinder A;'t%c:les 2226 8: 227 of the
Cbzistitiition Oi" _£nd.ia'- p.f'ayii1g to qtiasii the impugned orciers
 Ci_i.(§.9?;-2.{}()7'()i'i RE3S'P"{',)'I1(:i§'I";"[ i\iO.1 and etc.

A '   -.Tl"1i.$"pétitio-:1 coming on for hearing this day, the court
1ii"i".',;1L'.i'-(7% th :3" 'f(5'ii.§)V\'~i'i"ivg'fi.

QR DER

/7!"

V x _ in. this writ petition the petitioners have prayed for a writ

  _i,1}..':i.i1&3 nature of certiorari to tgaiasii the order dated 13.3.2006 at



ORDER

1) Writ petition is Iiereby alloweci.

IE) The impugned orders 3% Aiiiiexiires %..A

6.9.2007 and 13.3.2006 ii A’

Iii) Ordered accordinglyfi

D R B