High Court Kerala High Court

The Principal vs N.Somadas on 19 September, 2007

Kerala High Court
The Principal vs N.Somadas on 19 September, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA No. 2191 of 2007()


1. THE PRINCIPAL,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,

                        Vs



1. N.SOMADAS, S/O NARAYANAN,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER,

                For Petitioner  :M/S.IYER & IYER, SC.KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA

                For Respondent  :SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS,SC RAILWAY

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :19/09/2007

 O R D E R
                    H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.T.SANKARAN,J.
                     ----------------------------------------------------
                          W.A. NO. 2191 OF 2007 E
                     ----------------------------------------------------
                     Dated this the 19th September, 2007

                                    JUDGMENT

H.L.DATTU, C.J.

This appeal is directed against the orders passed by the learned

single Judge in W.P.(C) No.15756 of 2007, dated 29th June, 2007. By the

impugned judgment, the learned single Judge has directed the appellants

herein (respondents 1 and 2 in the Writ Petition) to admit the

petitioner’s/first respondent’s daughter in the Kendriya Vidyalaya No.1,

Palakkad.

2. Several contentions are raised by the appellants in this appeal.

But, we do not intend to go into those contentions. We reserve those

contentions of the appellants to argue in appropriate cases.

3. Since the learned single Judge has directed the appellants herein

to admit the petitioner’s daughter to Class IV and that direction has already

been complied with by the appellants, at this stage, we do not intend to

interfere with the impugned judgment. Therefore the following:

O R D E R

i) The Writ Appeal is rejected.

ii) The orders passed by the learned single Judge shall not be treated

as a precedent in any other case.

iii) Liberty is reserved to the appellants to raise all such contentions

W.A. NO.2191 OF 2007

:: 2 ::

which are available to them and also the contentions raised in this Writ

Appeal in appropriate proceedings.

Ordered accordingly.

(H.L.DATTU)
Chief Justice

(K.T.SANKARAN)
Judge
ahz/