High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Smt. Ritu Sethi And Others vs State Of Punjab And Another on 17 February, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Smt. Ritu Sethi And Others vs State Of Punjab And Another on 17 February, 2009
Criminal Misc. No. M-13177 of 2008                                  1




     In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh.


                 Criminal Misc. No. M-13177 of 2008

                     Date of Decision: 17.2.2009


Smt. Ritu Sethi and Others
                                                           ...Petitioners
                                Versus
State of Punjab and Another
                                                        ...Respondents


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA.


Present: Mr. Bipan Ghai, Senior Advocate
         with Ms. Harnam Dhillon, Advocate
         for the petitioners.

         Mr. Mehardeep Singh, Assistant Advocate
         General, Punjab, for respondent No.1-State.

         Mr. Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate
         for respondent No.2.


Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral)

Petitioner No.1 is wife of elder brother of husband of the

complainant. Petitioners No.2 and 3 are the elder sisters of the husband

of the complainant. Petitioner No.4 is elder brother of husband of the

complainant. They are facing prosecution in case FIR No. 177 dated

7.12.2007, registered at Police Station Division No. 7, Jalandhar, under

Sections 406, & 498-A IPC.

Counsel for the petitioners has fairly submitted that in the

present case, report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has been submitted. He

has stated that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition with
Criminal Misc. No. M-13177 of 2008 2

liberty to raise all arguments available to him before the trial Court at

appropriate stage.

In alternative, counsel for the petitioners has prayed that

taking into consideration the relations of petitioners and the fact that they

are settled far away from the matrimonial affairs of the complainant and

her husband, therefore, personal appearance of the petitioners be

exempted before the trial Court.

I find merit in the alternative submission made by counsel for

the petitioners. Accordingly, personal appearance of the petitioners is

exempted before the trial Court subject to filing an undertaking that they

shall cause appearance as and when required and the evidence

recorded in their absence but in the presence of their counsel shall be

binding upon them. Trial Court may also specify any other condition in

the undertaking to be furnished by the petitioners. On the furnishing of

undertaking, the personal appearance of petitioners shall stand

exempted.

As prayed, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with

liberty aforesaid.

(Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia)
Judge
February 17, 2009
“DK”