High Court Karnataka High Court

Mohammed Haneef S/O Late Ahamed … vs Joint Registrar Of Co Operative … on 25 August, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Mohammed Haneef S/O Late Ahamed … vs Joint Registrar Of Co Operative … on 25 August, 2010
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer
I 3 X
115'! THE HIGH CGURT OF KARHATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 25"' DAY SF AUGUST, 2010

BEFCIRE

THE I-IOWELE nmwmcs SJLBDUL  -_    2 

 

ma. momma HAHEEF
mm: wow 56 mg  "
syo um; Amsmn ABDUL  
wenms as $2 umaemn v
(arms: snszrmsxon), V 
mamam cc+-cmmmm ~ %  3  j A ~ 
L'l'.D., cmmar. omen, mwmmasm    
mmmmxn arse 05:   M  2.  %  .;~--..;°E'I'I'IIi1J19IEI~'¢

my  ' L  '1si3v.)

£12

1. JEN?  cm (Si: smnamm
sxracrmms,  :3.-mn,
-- IJ'EF£..E'1Mm1T cm"<::'o--omm'mn

V" ~ .1nzAz:.Ac1mcEsu.1, Amasma mm,

%  Ts.an'cgs1oa_E*~sgsoe52

2. A  co-ornmnvn BAKE L'1'B.,
-gEP_m'n's annmzmmmn
cagrzzyaa. omen, saawmmnem
 556052

._  R%»$'I"RfiR GP CO-GPERAIIVE
g 866131128, {RETD)AH1} WQIER? OFFICER,
T 135% A11} R0563, HEW mm
BAHGAHPET, KGIAR DIS'i'RIC'l'



4. TIIEABDYHOHAL REGISTRAR OF C0-GPERATIVE
8303135 IE KARKATAKA
ALI AISKAR R0151} ,
B.fiKG:ALGRE W052  RESPOHD_ENTS

(By mrr.:a&.c.xAe-.asrnnnE, new FOR 31, ms AND R4
SR1 Momma sammm, ADV. mu m)

'rm merr rrrmox 3 mm; GREEK AR.f::s:I,322:3 arm " u ..
227 OF THE conszrmnox or mDIa;»~?RAY£HG  
ma: REf'O!?1' DATED 29.7.2003 5'f,IBH!'I'"i',$D_ B?..m;z,__  ;
RESPOHDEBT ms  fi  'IE3 omsa n.a:r5nAwJ%V

4.7.2009 rassm: B? 122 12?  yum AEHEXURE-E
am am.      

mm Wm mmox cc:nm"  cm EGRVVATPE {A An?

Kmmm 9* exam  nA2',.--------'m:e ':*:a(3:Jn'r"1~*;~.$a:;:n mg
munwmea   ; _   , 

   _  sought for quashmg' at
the repoft.   1-«pendent at Anmzxure-A
dntezl V29.e7%.%2s;3'aVkaa *ea1a£s' me order passed by this 1»

 4*?  B tinted 43.2309 sand for



  64 of the Karnataka Ce-operz'stf.z'wa So-mltuzies

V'  (for 11:10:: 'the Act'). we 3?' raspuzzdmt was

" as an mquiry oficw for the said purptme. The 31'

u A respondent aubmittfi has 1-apart as per Anmmure-A datecl

.. 3 ..

29.7.2008 to the 1*’ raapondmt. The 1″ mspondant has
passed an ordmr as pm: Armature-B nwkst the petitiosner
untier mum as oftheAet. Fe-ding aw-1’ama,tha

has fled an appeal under section 106 at’ the

N’u.!”.>AP[ 13443; 2009- :0. In em said appeal, figéa Q’

tqxplicaizinn am pm Amexure–H

Annmtura-«B, Sines the

disposed of, the p¢:tit1onar’ hasV ‘V

the aforesaid reiifia.

3. wauld contmd

ware ma” an 2’r.1o.2oo9. The

§:’y”th¢.§’+*1; zmpmdmt and it was pasta! for

V. to Howewr, the 4*” raspondmt has

the mafia matts nor has has paaaed any

.t’£:n:ai seeking intwixn reiiaf. fizerefore,

has appmachad this Court fin’ quaslfing the

‘ rwmt atAntxe:rure-8. and the order at Annexure-B.

4. It is widmt from the materials on reward that the
«ppm! and the appiication was filad by the pefitiorna: before

14$

tlzw 4*” rmpoxxdent an 27.10.2699. Whmmw an appfiau-‘Elan

fa.-1ma§pm1iafle:isad:ing3nin1& m.-rims,
azuthznéity has to eonsiflam the same within fl. M ‘

Be that as it may. As submitted ifmf V’

the putifionm’, the matter has

oz-dax. Iffusr any reason, the»§§a.V;.”p,,,”‘-;¢1eamtVVAis.:zifi’a’&1ié to ” ‘

éiupasas of the main ngxttw, di8:?.wn:§ of the

5. ma-gm, ; to pass an
zprprepziate “(Annaxure-H) sewn:
intarhzzl in mm in 3 pcfltion to
dispose €£ The writ petition stands
cfispageti af gzasts.

Sd/–

Iudge