High Court Kerala High Court

Melvin vs State Of Kerala on 26 May, 2009

Kerala High Court
Melvin vs State Of Kerala on 26 May, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 2524 of 2009()


1. MELVIN, S/O. MICHAEL,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :26/05/2009

 O R D E R
                            K.T.SANKARAN, J.
               ------------------------------------------------------
                        B.A. NO. 2524 OF 2009 A
               ------------------------------------------------------
                     Dated this the 26th May, 2009


                                 O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner apprehends that he would be

made an accused in Crime No.70 of 2009 of Koratty Police Station.

Learned Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner is not arrayed as an

accused and that the police only suspects that the petitioner has

committed the offence.

2. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under Sections 457

and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The de facto complainant alleged that the mobile phone

belonging to his daughter was stolen. The incident allegedly took place

on 31.12.2008. It was reported to the police only on 23.2.2009. The

petitioner has a case that he is in love with the daughter of the de facto

complainant. On 22.2.2009, the family members of the de facto

complainant went for a second show movie. On their return, the petitioner

was found in the room of the de facto complainant’s daughter and that he

was beaten black and blue by the de facto complainant’s people.

B.A. NO. 2524 OF 2009

:: 2 ::

According to him, the attempt of the de facto complainant is to make him

an accused in a case involving non-bailable offence and to see that he is

put behind the bars.

4. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case,

the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am of the view that

anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner. There will be a direction

that in the event of the arrest of the petitioner, the officer in charge of the

police station shall release him on bail for a period of one month on his

executing bond for Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like

amount to the satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the

following conditions:

a) The petitioner shall report before the investigating officer between

9 A.M. and 11 A.M. on all Mondays, till the final report is filed or

until further orders;

b) The petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer for

interrogation as and when required;

c) The petitioner shall not try to influence the prosecution witnesses

or tamper with the evidence;

B.A. NO. 2524 OF 2009

:: 3 ::

d) The petitioner shall not commit any offence or indulge in any

prejudicial activity while on bail;

e) On the expiry of the period mentioned above, the petitioner shall

surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail;

f) In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, the

bail shall be liable to be cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated above.

(K.T.SANKARAN)
Judge

ahz/