High Court Karnataka High Court

Kamala Gandhi Nehru Education, vs State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 23 July, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Kamala Gandhi Nehru Education, vs State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 23 July, 2008
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh
{N THE HI(}H (.?(.')UR'I' OF KAR_?*u'A'l'AKA AT    

Dated this the 23"' day of July, 2993  

Before   '

HIE HUMBLE MR JUSTICE Hr}2:UI;:2wi «G. .. « .  

Writ Pmzfon 2aw:--.4._V/ 2é237 ¢Ed:z)*[ "  

Kamaia Gandhi Nehru  'A  V' 
Maduraxml Colony, T3varekere','EITM'FL 'Digit    M --
Bangalore 560 081 - By its Secretary  1  "

Smt Nusrat Samara  Patitioner

(By Sri K N Subbi.,Reédf5._ Aa£¢)_ i  

And:

H w 

1 State of  «.7 h}*. ifs -Secretary
Deparfinmt offidagaiion' " 
Vidi1'a13a'Soudi:a;, Batxgzieréi'

2 Director "t$I'l?V1¢t¥ia1ic"
V ~ ' 5K  Circle, Béxzgalpgje. 1

j " 1. _ umay  ofPuh1ic Instruction
V  B21_1ig.:;10;é Sonih, Kalasipalyam

V . 4  ofPub}ic instruction

Bangaixoe Nnrth, Ofo Joint Director Camgus

 A. ,  K Gkoad, Banyiore I

  I5'   'fleputy Direcior of Public Instruction

Bangalore: Rural, 010 It. Director Campus
K G Road, Bangalore 1 Respondents

V (By Szi B Manohar, cm)

W

This Writ Petition is filed under Art.226J227 of the Cqnstimtion
praying to quash annexure D issued by the 3″‘ respondent, etc. 1_

This Writ Petifion earning on rm Hearing this mas
the following: = .. +-

Petitioner has sought ft:-1* issnancc xof cefiiaraxfi. the

order passed by the Gove:1:rnexit*..g§}g:;;;’uxg ‘a1;A;j1Ii__<:3ufi:.jV;4:'V1'""t£)'V accoéd
permission in fingfish and net allowi-n~g..§11a 'gjetitioneféixxstimviion te impari
education in English mediIii°¥i' f<;r to declare that

language policy of tits: State;'Géve§5é§.~ng§nt.V:'maidng.:fiiééium of instnlction as

Kanna<ia;'Vi§f'"zia'iixééf fix uIt3'«§i?ii'eVE to the Constimtian of India am}
contrary lie' Ax7'§tielo_3Vi3f:1'}.Vgji'v,fig:ns£§£ution and further declare that the

petitiuner-insxtiizztiaxa Aém:er}é"bLVright to use English at a medium of

V. «_ instrjs1<§'t.io;1'_Tiza the scf1bo!.._and' the said policy is not binding on the petitioner

has ~$o'e,a§ht .;for a mandamus direczting the Respondents-aufltorities to

éegc«irdV'p§:§1t;'£§sioV;1:= £15 the petitioner–school to impart educazion in Engjish

~V rioitste interfere with the conduct at' the classes of the petitianer

" " " . §.:::~,e.:4_ in Ehgzish Medium.

fleard the savage; for the petitionar and the Govternment Advacate.

/WV.

it appears, the petiticmer has moves} the Resmnfiggtféfitfiéxfifies

geeking far commencemeni of primary schools

insmxciien taking shcfiter of the Fail Ben§§1{<;1£§éisi§3fi._of: VL

Bench has quashed same of the _conditvi'(;»z1s 'én. the 'me
Government dated 29.4.1994 to the; up to éV~.duca£i'éfi,

the institutions shail impart e:1pca:io;:'b:1:§{

Be that as itjgrgay, ttjé inc {)f'£h_§ petmar that by virtue of Full
Bench decision éingl §is..a«_ma&q__é§.figfi£ ::t he§f_are entitled to ixngaaxt edamatian

in English. .:I!§iii11_£fi sahqgfif

1:: is__ !heA: é$:1t§r:1i_V§,sian–.–£_;é;- .b

from 2{)G9~1G.

In that View of the matter, petiticifier his «r1¢_i:”‘-<~;:te«:l baggprdaxéh like 7

Gavemment by filing fresh appiicatigns. it is f gf ths

to take 3 decisicen to award approva} '${;.'cnmmehci:£riL*1Vj}§vf: schcefs

imparting English as medium ,£1 f instr;1cii:2fi_;'-

In View cf the F111} de;;isi<2'gnvo'f*t}§és the endorsement so

isaued byfffié reiiféiciziiig tfg;-:x_'é;5gjl'icaticsn of the petitioner is heieby

quashed. 'i?e1§i;ionV is. fiilr.-wed in pm.

Sd/-%