IN THE HIGH coma' or» KARNATAKA AT 7;' u A DATED THIS THE 3111 DAY on APRIL A 'D PRESENT '1'-HE I-ION'BLE MR.JUS'l'ICE RIM D X W/o. Late K.P.Sfiniv'a9_,Z'* 64 years, 5;; ~ Rjby her GPA Eiofiér; ' ' ---- . Dinesh ¥:.;;__ V S,1a.D.es'a.-}-waj 1'; _ iii Fioor, No;.31,..C 1'-fpaii, BANGA_DORE.~., . _ 2. Dincsi1"Rank.D, ., Asia. Dev2aj.Raa1€a. DDDDD " 52. yearé, .415, l\!r.'n=-.. 1 Pu'.P§G.§'LGi33-E}'--«. npyt-.=%I. I'-II» Byfiri-*L.uovm" Advocate) D '+'\.ND?D D Karnataka, itza SD_¢.mDt.e_ry, % '*Hpu§iing- and Urban Development * "&;§ar'_u'aar.t, -M.S.B'aikii:i§ D ~»._D'r.A1nbedkar Road, BANGALORE--560 001. , 0/»-"' W'- I __.1 2. The ham: Acquisition Oficer, Bangalore Development Authority, Ku-mam Park(Weat) BANGALORE-560 020. J _ 3. The Bangalore .
De-eebpment uthonty
Kumara Park (West)
‘Bangaiore–:’560 020 .9
By its Respondents 3
(By Sn’ R.K.Hatti_, HCGP, rm-g§:.1, M
Smtflowharunniea, Advocate, ;_fo R-210: R43far, ” –.
Sri .B.=V=!3.b_a.I_1_k.a_ro_na_reI,y;a_n_a. Ego, ‘Ad1roeate;£o_’R,e2″&_. 3)
‘ie 226 35 227 of
the Constitution of ‘W-quash the Endorsement
dated 30-9-2006’!vjide ‘3An.aexu1e-_U– as illegal, arbitrary and
unjust and also to =the.__1″” respondent to de-notify the
schedule ..acq1£i§i’fio’n proceedings.
This Writ’ Petition eemiiig on for pn-,1nnina:y’ hearing’ in
2.. ..-1..– – re… …a. ………:I.. 4.1.- 4’…11……:..
gl”ITI”}§ uuy, \..auuv’:u. u.|uu.c ulc IUIIUW §3=
ORDER.
A: the request of both the counsels the Petition is
0 0″ up forsfinal disposal.
The petitioners seeks for a writ of oertiorari to quash
00 the Government Order dated 30-09-2006 vide Annexuze-“U”
, /7′
\V\
and for a writ of mandamus to direct the 1″
de-notify the schedulc PIOP°1’tY and for other reliefs-.;j” ‘hr:
3. The acquisition for the lands in qirestioniisibgr wot’.
a preliminary Notification issued as meaywmiag
followed by a final Notification the
T|_1.ere._fi.er m, by
– +=~–‘*=- ——–I-4. in A’ by
virtue of a mquesifiiv scam’ exte-t
of land wa the lands belonging
to the the petitioners is that
the been dc-notified from
acqtrisitica ‘thereforethetii property also should
–de-notified, Vtomde–noti:l3r the lands is arbitrary and
“private layouts have been formed around
+1. .n.z, ‘i~inn etg.
l
I
Q
l
V. Government ‘by virtue of the irnpugneci order has ‘
…_”:oonsilered the claim of the petitioners for cle-notifying the
lands. it has taken into consideration the various orders
A 1
_,__.a
___…..a 1…. n.:.. .r”I……a. :. u:..:4. D an..- 4::1…: ‘L… 4.1.- .2….t.”.,:7,
fiuaacu uy uua uuu..n. Lu W n. rfiuuuua umu
owners etc. The Committee has aiso appiied its ~
have come to a just and fair conclusion eo3ieideii_sVn§’the.V
plea of the petit1’oners.
5. I do not find any “aI’h’itra1’y
approach by the respondezttt. impugned
– ., ‘..’…___…– _.._
Ids.-.1: T11. W011 s I1rged_….bg.r_ ‘t11_e.ee eazmot be
weptefi m’- vie-‘ inf V”eeeei-?ttL*-a’;’ :sa?n?4e*-..e.o’**== .o..°'”-ow” b–….n
considered
the 1988 and therefore
it would not be %peope’rtL1oe to interfere in the well
reasoned omclerfl iespondents.
_Fo;.~ reasons, the Writ Petition is devoii of
— Vt is rejected. No order as to costs.