Sri N P Ramachandra Naidu vs Kumari Manjula on 1 July, 2008

Izma coum cs KARNATAKA I-HGH qr.-mar OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH coum or: KARNATAKA HIGH couar er KARNATAKA HiGH I

zataxnahié ‘y 2i,§.E$$§I ?%$$$f$EQ, it canfiat

ha $:ifi tmat Ehe iffiagmefi sgfiex wag mafié an

i. fiaaznaé £$uma€3 §§i'”t%e, gsiitiaflér”

aubmitfi that thgugh t&aV§§ti€§§ger h§s”§iiédV&

IQ}

Etitiam ix Eiac. Sage is.

w

M¢§2§$3.::fgeg ésida

E

E’

E: gxvmazta awa:$”,%fi.ai£& €i£ed E§”§&x stay

af ggwgazta awaréy fig? ééé iéainfifi Jndgg hag

mat ya: éi$§&§§£ gf ;递aiay_p§titi5n and ma

ti; zzhef h&n§”?Zfiééé§Qium:i§ aha axéantisa

cage” ” §&%$af§%%I wi€ giéfig that the Eivii

Ju’ga u{§:wV §§;§; Kfi1a£; may’ be dixaatéfi. ta

fiifigfififi $f*Ei3:; Ec;§fE%Q§ withim a azipulated

I;,;:I A ‘

fi_.’i§§Knsfi gganfigl fa: tfig getitiener

If§:thé:3%ubmit$ that 3&3 vehicifi in qfifiatien

‘E

%a3flfzn§azefi wifin finitefi Emfiia Enaatamte
V §ém§an3; bat tha ra3§an£§mt hfis mafia Saw India

V’aaauxaxca Camyamy as a §az§yI Since the

gatitisnax had we kaawlefigé ahamt tha ease, ha