High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Smt. Mukhtiar Kaur And Others vs State Of Punjab And Another on 28 August, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Smt. Mukhtiar Kaur And Others vs State Of Punjab And Another on 28 August, 2009
Crl. Misc. No.M-8892 of 2009                                  1



      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                      CHANDIGARH

                              Crl. Misc. No.M-8892 of 2009

                              Date of Decision : 28.08.2009

Smt. Mukhtiar Kaur and others                      ...Petitioners

                              Versus

State of Punjab and another                        ...Respondents


CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

Present: Mr. R.S.Bains, Advocate,
         for the petitioners.

          Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Sr. Advocate, with
          Mr. Harmanjeet Singh, Advocate,
          for respondent No.2.

HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL)

Learned counsel for the petitioners points out that this Court in

Crl. Misc. No.56359-M of 2003 at the instance of Gurvinder Singh and

Sukhbir Singh has stayed the criminal proceedings pending decision of

the civil suit. Similar is the order passed in Crl. Misc. No.41383-M of

2007 filed by Sukhbir Singh. But inadvertently in Crl. Misc. No.30353-

M of 2007, an order has been passed directing the trial Court to continue

with the trial. It is pointed out that the order in Crl. Misc. No.30353-M of

2007 is in contradiction with the earlier orders. Therefore, further

proceedings in the criminal complaints till the civil suit is decided,

require to be stayed.

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in

view the orders passed in Crl. Misc. Nos.56359-M of 2003 and 41383-M

of 2007, it is fair and reasonable to stay the proceedings in the complaints
Crl. Misc. No.M-8892 of 2009 2

before the learned trial Court till such time the proceedings in civil suit

(now pending in RSA No.1653 of 2008) attain finality. After the decision

of the appeal, a liberty is given to the parties to seek revival of the

complaints and to seek appropriate orders from the competent Court.

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

28.08.2009                                      (HEMANT GUPTA)
Vimal                                               JUDGE