High Court Karnataka High Court

Ambedkar Sc/St Educational And … vs State Of Karnataka By Its … on 23 October, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Ambedkar Sc/St Educational And … vs State Of Karnataka By Its … on 23 October, 2008
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer

u–u

“W” * “ff..’-4”}:-lax: ur nunm:-xu-nan I-mar’! LUUKI O!’ KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT 0?’ KARNAWKKA H161′! C

ulna

IX TEE EIQE CQUET Of EERHREKEEE BAHGELORE

fififfifi @515 THE zszd may as QCTQEER, 2@a$ [‘,

EEE§RE

a::;:}:’Esz..a 2£R…J¥}STICE sszsma r§.:s*zc§«;A:;.s;V’-~A.T.”‘

wax? Eawzrzam mc,?7a2 my 2505 ggggggfie-P}:; [__

filfififififii

ling: Pg
*3’?

Q

*J§ZRL flfiflffififi Tflfifi
%3; KQEIGEBELLI, M

fl E W W
H a:,:;r

%am$&L§ag~5§a $§& ‘”

E? zfig gficagégat
Eiuza.:Q¢na:;;1Ea§EéaJ§:,’*.

Mia

£3?)$x;uawg:§a33§a;;é§%£*»-,*

E35?

3. stawg 9§’KAKmkmé
E? 3?? yRI§$:§AL $2: TS

‘§EEfi£&R acfsw znacA?:eER;~ f-‘

‘5 ,,, §E?E?IQNER

Eflififififfififlfi sfiéfiwgagazmmfizmfi

.» H,EaB$E$B§§fi§
‘.’f§£§qi$a3s§a§ am:

F0

$33 §§§$?3 BIEECTQR GE
gggazg Efi€TR§£TI%H

-» ggaggzanagxaawag

xx” KfifiEEs$w§a Raap
,’E£E$fiLGRE*5§% aaz

R”»i3y fir: gkmgxégag, gag;

.H R£SP$RDENTS

. §g_yf.»n- an uxmnivnlflmm nmwfi LUUKI ur KAKNRJAKA HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HKGH COURT OF KARNATAKA H35-H C

I-3:»

Q$d§£n Em. this ccnnaetian, ha ihaa relied. an

r.-“:§.%:c2′.aic=n :35 mm fiauzt in mm;

us’ wmara mmmrm & 530% — 1.9?ag;2;.’_ ig; .?

£93 amfi

Efififi KER 5143.

E’ Learneé, fi§£ agfiéariag f3x, the
:a$pmmfi$n?a has saug§i téW3$étifi§;fiha imugned

mzdera.

in Paigmaifi o£’*:hé<;im§u§héd. order skews
that Lhé 3a&¢$3 ré3§afifient–%as pasaad a cyalaw

atylfifi Qféez wgfihéutrfiyfilying hia mind. This

Qafirt im Sfiflfi-Lmfififlflrs saga {supra} and

"mflw fi§2.'%"é&3a isqpra; hag dapreaated

Qfafifiité Qf gassing cycl9~styled Qrder by

thg E

1 *vthg W_ quagiffiufiiciai amtharities withant

"f}f§py1i$a$ifin sf minfi. Thug, the mzéer impugned
*i§_;§fi§itrary ix; natura and. ix liable ta She

'qga$ha&,

he

vzge. V38 m 3

— .usa’v::;;-9.2% _ T T