IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 16651 of 2008(G)
1. BINDU.K.S, OPTHALMIC ASSISTANT,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS
... Respondent
2. THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES,
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, PRIMARY HEALTH
For Petitioner :SRI.T.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH
Dated :04/06/2008
O R D E R
K.M. JOSEPH, J.
````````````````````````````````````````````````````
W.P.(C) No. 16651 OF 2008 G
````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Dated this the 4th day of June, 2008
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner calls in question Ext.P3. Ext.P3 is a
proceedings dated 27.5.2008 by the 2nd respondent ordering
general transfer. Petitioner is serial No.59 in the said
proceedings. She is transferred from Primary Health Centre,
Konni to Taluk Head Quarters Hospital, Chalakudy. Feeling
aggrieved, the petitioner has already preferred Ext.P5
representation before the 1st respondent.
2. I heard the learned Government Pleader also. He
points out that the petitioner should have filed Ext.P5
representation before the 2nd respondent. There is no case of
malafides as such. I do not find any good ground to interfere
with the impugned order under Article 226 of the Constitution.
The petitioner has already filed Ext.P5 before the 1st
respondent. In such circumstances, the writ petition is
disposed of as follows.
WPC.16651/08
: 2 :
3. The 1st respondent will make over Ext.P5
representation to the 2nd respondent within one week from the
date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Upon receipt of
Ext.P5 representation, the 2nd respondent will treat it as a
representation addressed to him and take a decision thereon
in accordance with law, within two weeks from the date of
receipt of the representation from the 1st respondent.
Sd/-
(K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE)
aks
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE