IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CR. REV. No.550 of 2009
MAHADEO TANTI S/O LATE BORHAN TANTI
--- PETITIONER
Versus
1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
2. KARUNA DEVI W/O MAHADEO TANTI
--- OPP. PARTIES.
For the petitioner : Mr. Achal Kumar Sinha, Advocate.
For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar no.1, Advocate.
-----------
02 09.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 21.01.2009
passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jamui in
Maintenance case no. 37M/2005 whereby on a consideration of
the materials brought on record it has been found that a sum of
Rs. 400/- (Four hundred) per month payable from the date of
order would be appropriate amount of maintenance payable to
the wife for her maintenance as also maintenance of daughter.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
pursuant to a panchayati the petitioner had already executed six
kathas of land in favour of the wife for her maintenance. It
appears keeping that aspect in mind learned trial Court has fixed
meager amount by way of maintenance. This Court does not find
any patent illegality meriting interference. The application is
dismissed.
Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)