Gujarat vs State on 22 June, 2011

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.RA/395/2007	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
REVISION APPLICATION No. 395 of 2007
 

 
 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
 
 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

=========================================================


 

GUJARAT
STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED,THROUGH - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
Appearance : 
MR
KM PATEL for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) :
1, 
UNSERVED-EXPIRED (R) for Respondent(s) :
2, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 22/06/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
JUDGMENT

Heard
learned advocate Shri Jigar M. Patel for Mr. K.M Patel. Learned
advocate Shri Jigar M. Patel submitted that the Criminal Revision
Application is filed against the respondent no.2, essentially as
respondent no.2 was acquitted and as per the endorsement showing in
the board, as the respondent no.2 has passed away. This petition is
disposed of as having become infructuous. Orders accordingly. Rule is
discharged.

(S.R.BRAHMBHATT,
J.)

Pankaj

Top