Nagaraju @ Dol Nagaraj vs State Of Karnataka on 10 January, 2011

ORDER

 

Hcard bath akica. in rwpect of 

EEC! by accused No.5, sxigi 

regfitcred in Cr.Nc:r.23f)f _1O fc :£r..   
ulfier fit?nm' 143, 144;?-£45, 3c2,.:UTi%r/kg £49 of :3:

by the: Kollagéfla  1. 

2. of gum is that, the
   was given in
 @ government and as
   "was not taking care. of thc

  complainant brought her back

    was the reason for amused Hui

'    against 'Eh-ft oomplaizaantfi family. With

.' A  at about U6 mor1th5 pr-ior tn the data

"m'.'  fiomphmt, the mm of the cmnplainant by namc.

  VT  was seen going along with accused Nos.1 to

4 towards outside the viflage and tlicreafbmr,
Manjunath did not return home. I-Iowewer, on
02.10.2010

, it was rexaaaleci that tht dead body was
lying in the tank, w]:r£c:h was near the machine room

3

wt?”