High Court Kerala High Court

H.K. Meenakshy Ammal vs Kerala State Road Transport … on 11 November, 2008

Kerala High Court
H.K. Meenakshy Ammal vs Kerala State Road Transport … on 11 November, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 33192 of 2008(B)


1. H.K. MEENAKSHY AMMAL,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :11/11/2008

 O R D E R
                         S.SIRI JAGAN, J.

                   ==================

                    W.P(C).No. 33192 of 2008

                   ==================

          Dated this the 11th day of November, 2008

                         J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is a retired employee of the Kerala State

Road Transport Corporation. Her grievance is that her provident

fund and staff welfare fund amounts as also the arrears of pay

revision and leave surrender salary have not been paid to her.

According to her, although, for DCRG and commuted value of

pension, she has to stand in the queue in accordance with the

date of priority of her retirement, she is entitled to payment of

provident fund and staff welfare fund amounts immediately on

retirement. Regarding the claim for arrears of pay revision

amounts the petitioner relies on Ext.P2 judgment of the Division

Bench.

2. I have heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing

for the KSRTC also.

3. In so far as the provident fund and staff welfare fund

amounts are concerned, this Court has been consistently

directing the Corporation to pay the same within a stipulated

period. Accordingly, there would be a direction to the respondent

w.p.c.33192/08 2

to pay to the petitioner the provident fund and staff welfare fund

amounts due to the petitioner within one month from the date of

receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. As far as other claims

are concerned, the petitioner has already invoked the jurisdiction

of the respondent by filing Ext.P3. The respondent shall consider

and pass orders on Ext.P3 as expeditiously as possible, at any

rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy

of this judgment. The petitioner may rely on Ext.P2 or any other

material in support of her case at the time of hearing, for

enabling which the petitioner shall be afforded an opportunity of

being heard.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

sdk+                                          S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

             ///True copy///




                                   P.A. to Judge

w.p.c.33192/08    3