High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Ravindra Paswan &Amp; Anr vs State Of Bihar on 24 September, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Ravindra Paswan &Amp; Anr vs State Of Bihar on 24 September, 2010
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Cr.Misc. No.31983 of 2010
         1. RAVINDRA PASWAN S/O RAJBALAM PASWAN
         2. MADAN PASWAN S/O RAJBALAM PASWAN
                              Versus
                        STATE OF BIHAR
                             -----------

2. 24.09.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners

and the State.

The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted

for the offence under Sections 366 (A)/34 of the

Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that from the order of

the Sessions Judge in bail petition of the co-accused

it has been noted that the medical report had opined

that hymen is found intact indicating that no sexual

assault had been made upon the victim who is major.

Considering the same, let the petitioners

above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) each with two

sureties of the like amount each or any other surety

to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction

of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in

connection with Aurangabad (Town) P.S. Case No.

24/2010, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the

bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who
2

will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is

related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake

to furnish information to the Court about any change

in address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit

shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an

accused in any other case and if they are they shall

not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also

state on affidavit that he will inform the court

concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any

other case of similar nature after their release in the

present case and thereafter the court below will be at

liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of

bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will

give an undertaking that they will receive the police

papers on the given date and be present on date fixed

for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates

and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be

liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v) That

the petitioners will be well represented on each date if

they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail

will be liable to be cancelled.

Fahad.                            ( Anjana Prakash, J. )