-1- IN THE Hm:-4 coum or KARNATAKA AT BAN6ALOfR_f _ wrreb THIS me 10*" may or JUL'! ff é ' BEFORE me HON'BLE MRJUSTICE MQHAN$;HvANTA§QA§OUb;§§' A k gnxmmg P57111024 %No.k3453.*2k§x3e Between: V A A V 1. Smt. Puttamma V ' @ Paddamma A " " ' VJ/oD.Thippes\v&an:3::-D' Agacl about 'V ' 2. Kum. Anitfliié iivgiiari Die D. 'i'5hippeswa;*§;y._ " Aged Both R/a Ciiiifilfiagufa. Hoialkere Taluk ' ~ * V Ghitraipgiurga I}is1:ri'c:*:..__ _ ..Petitione:r9. I iBy:E'xt12t.H:Na1§:ii.'lgiikatesh for Miss Kesvy 85 Ca, Adv. ,) V V V ' 'Q. Thipfiweswfiifxy' A 51,10 Dasappa ' ' I ' A about 555" years J1_.1'niG:"'A§sistant *0 fa§_Se(;tion, KPTCL Kanipli; Hcaspet Taluk K -.._I3'c':I1a:}y District. ..Rcspondent V V ' _ '(By 'Sri Jagadeesh Goad Patii, Adv.) I 5" , 2 , This Crimina¥ Petition is filed under Section.482VT'»._'Cr:P.C. praying to set aside the order dated 19-4-2006 passed by Edd}, F'I'C., Chitradurga in Cr}. RP. No.16/2006 by enhancing'-the _aIuéQuz1t of maintenance awarded by the I Add}. JMFYIL, €11', Crl.Misc. No.58/2004 on 13-14006 from the datgpf ' This Criminal Petition coming on 6:-dam' thés the made the foilmving : " " 3 A Petitioners herein are d.. s'.§11gi1tt:r of respondent. They ._ Petition
No.69] 2004 praying for of Rs.3,000/ ~
and Rs.2,000!’-‘ Igonghf The trial Court
awardezd” per Immth to the 13*
pcfitioaiézr afifid ‘Rvjsfi _’m.o11th to the 2″” petitioner from
the date figs: ” .’:The order of the trial Court was
qu¢s;t§i;;¥1éd by herein before the Sessions Court
Petition No.15/2606. On hearing, the
Petition was dismissed. Questioning both
V –V the petition is filed.
H * Smt.Na}ini Venkatfish, lmmed counsel appearing for
. jjéztitioners on taking me through the material 011 record,
” mpfayed for enhancement of amount of maintenance. During
the course of arguments, she fairly submitted that in case if the
V
-3-
respondent is ordered to pay the maintenance pf
petiticm, the ends ofjustiee will be met.
-4.The respondent is about -ee»I4ie is ‘
Junior Assistant in KEB. The ‘ sale;
respondent is Re.12.127/~. i:-flfgettriztzg net
samxy of Rs.6,781/~. rsggving tetéjiiyyef the facts
and circumstances, in the amount of
maintenance Vat Rs.1,5D0/– and
Re.1.250/- in ‘the petitioners 1 and 2 is
just _v nnfviiiéjvseezzsiciexed opinion, the Ceurt
below ehonln eniiaintenanoe from the date of
petition, {here is nothing on record to Show
‘~ working during the pendency of the
‘henreizsfinnship between the parties is not in dispute.
Theflreibre; of the Courts below are liable to be j
‘.Vmodiafiedie3.3ife:hly to the said extent. Aeecrrdingly, the fi)1k:xwi11g
‘ .. f«:31A’der.. is made :
The respondent is directed to pay the maintenance ef
L’Rs.1,5oo/- and Rs.1,250f– per month respectively to
if
-4-
pefitioncrs 1 and 2 fmin the date of petition. fl§I’l6
Courts belaw are modified accordingly.
‘bk?’