High Court Karnataka High Court

Wep Solutions India Limited vs Nil on 20 October, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Wep Solutions India Limited vs Nil on 20 October, 2010
Author: H N Das
IN THE HIGH COURT OP KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 20% DAY OF OCTOBER, 2010
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOHAN':D,AS,, A

C.A.N6.847 2010   

BETWEEN:

WEP SOLUTIONS INDIA LIIVHTED

REGISTERED OFFICE 

40/IA, BASAPPA COMPLEX  

LAVELLE ROAD  ,    , 
BANGALORE:  ' _, I A *         APPLICANT

(SHRISAII ~P.IOEI:II=I,.j,ESP]'LEGAL , ADV.)

AND:

     AAAAA  .....RESPONDENT

~ RAEVELICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 391 OP
‘THE’CO£vfij’—-A3?JIES ACT, 1956, RM? RULES 6 8: 9 AND 46 8: 67

OF~._TH_E’ COII/IPANIEs(COURT) RULES, I959, PRAYING TO

_ ORDERFOR CONVENING OF SEPARATE MEETINGS OF THE
AEOUITT SHAREHOLDERS, SECURED CREDITORS AND
UNSECURED CREDITORS OF THE APPLICANT COMPANY
TOR APPROVING THE SCHEME OF ARRANGMENT
..,,.I3ETwEEN wEP SOLUTIONS INDIA LIIvIITED(APPLICANT

COMPANY/TRANSFEROR COMPANY) WITH DATANET

P,»

KL

SYSTEMS LIMITED(TRANSFEREE COMPANY) TO BE..__HELD
AT THE REGISTERED OFFICE OF THE APPVLI_4ACA_NT
COMPANY OR AT SUCH OTHER PLACE A.SfM’A.Y. BE

DETERMINED BY THE COURT, FOR 1éURP’OSES OF
CONSIDERING AND, IF THOUGHT FIT, AFFROVINC §7»’I”‘I”H__V
OR WITHOUT MODIFICATION T}}E».AFCé_RESA’ID’ SCHEME

OF ARRANGMENT AND ETC.,. pg :

This application CO1’1’1iI1g’:_OH_VfO1″ Orderspthisi lday,.._tl1e.3 court!’

made the following;

In this application,applicant/transferor company has

prayed fOf.’–{J”€1″IIE:l:ViSii_S’}lOI1v jto’1~Conx{eri;e. separate meetings of the

sharehioldersi’AF.i;and ofviiiilthe applicant-Company for
approving the’ rSc1ze’131″é-.,,,i__of “Arrangement produced as per

AnE§eXure–F “be:tWVeenv’ the Applicant COIr1pany(TransferOr

» Datanet Systems Limited(TraI1Sferee Company).

« 2′.Tii”_}7hei~i.:;.AVpplicant-Company was originally incorporated

under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, on 18.9.2007

A f_” the name and style of Wep Solutions India Private Limited

M Iivith the Registrar of Companies, Karnataka. The applicant

E–.»
r”-.}

/’

Company was subsequently converted into a public _.limited

company under the name and style as Wep

Limited with effect from 19.12.2007. The registerve’d.:.officei”ol” VlIl”I:\\\\\

applicant company is situated at 40/

Road, Bangalore-1.

3. The authorised share the’Applica1it;–Cornpany
is Rs.30,0(),00,000/– dmaiéa _iI”ii-to equity shares of

Rs.10/– each. _:”Issued,””suhlscriibeda aridzdlpaid up capital is

Rs.18,32~,54,4i3zt)l/4″agvtdeéjp -into’-s1,,a3*’j25,442/W equity shares of

Rs. 10/ V V

T he nialii1.oVh_}f_ects of the Applicant–Cornpany is to design,

V inK?ent,’v..dexfelop,–. manufacture, assemble, update, market, trade,

buty,l sell, ‘alter, resell, remodel, lease, install, revise, import,

expott,udistribute, service, and etc., and morefully described in

Kl\l/Ieiriorandurn and Articles of Associations, produced at

l m”AI1I1€X1l1’€-A. The latest audited balancesheet made upto

J1

ii

31.3.2010 and a copy of the said balancesheet is produced at

Annexu re–B.

5. The Board of Directors of the Applicanttfioliritiaiigi

apptoved and adopted the Scheme of Jtrrangerifientélinithellmeetiiig ‘

held on 31.7.2010, by virtue of which,_ the sha.re_lA.ca’pital

transferee company is reduced atlllfhléiratio of -1/l”5r”‘l-lof existing,
issued, and paid up share,c’apitz–i_l; the’. L’./[_ana’ged Printing Solutions

Division of the.v.Applica11t».Company’ lis «glide-linerged into the

transfereetvc.on1panj;3::and “etc-.,.

,6. The _:OlJ}e.i:t lClau’sle 111(3) (12) of the Memorandum of

applicant-company contemplates and authorises

.t_he__tiraiiisiereepoinpany to purchase or otherwise acquire whole

or any of the business undertaking.

~ l7′.”.The Counsel for the applicant has furnished all the

‘material facts relating to the applicant–corr1pany and he submitted

5….»

dis

that there are 1575 equity shareholders in the applicant company

as on 30.9.2010 and it is also submitted that there

creditors and 230 unsecured creditors in the applic~ant:.icompain3?,_V 0

Therefore, convening of the meetings ofithiejjveliqriityeshareholders,

secured creditors and unsecured creditors i’iV_arg;»..,necessary._*

Accordingly, I pass the following..ord’er:l”gA

1)

Appliicaitionl” is .lal:lovfed..V”e»j?ipp1icant-company is

.permitte’d’~to.lconyenegseparate meetings of

5i_e:1u’ity__shareho1ders,, secured creditors and

‘–:llr_§lc1itv§.irs on Saturday, 20.11.2010

11.30 a.rn., and 12.00 Noon

W,_ili=espect.i%}’e<i§}, at the registered office of the

00 <..Applicar1t~Company at No.40/1A, Basappa

ii)

“”Co’mplex, Lavelle Road, Bangalore–1 under

the Chairmanship of
lVIr.Ram N.Agarwal —Chairmjan 8: Whole

time Director, failing him 1VIr.Deepal<
A.Chari, Director.

The chairman shall issue individual notices to

all the equity shareholders, secured creditors
.3″

d’

Yn.

iii)

6

and unsecured creditors of the applicant
company mentioning the date, time and place

of the meetings and the applicant 5 xclonflpany

shall take out notices of the meetingsvin

Hindu’ English daily and” V’

Kannada daily, infits Bangalore editlonson or

before 28.10.20l0..h

The quorurn_V.’o~£_ thellneetingv-t_oF._;theV equity” V

shareholdersV_s_hal,l__ ‘L-»e_V “b.y_pe_rson or by

proxy,_z:€;e_culred2,j_b’creditors __shall be two, by

person. ‘by’ proxy7″anld*~ urllsecured creditors

lllgshhall. he by proxy.

shall. submit the report of the
‘1n_ee’tii1gls” —.___lwit’hin two weeks from the
” cionclnsionl of the meetings.

(ljrd’ere’d accordingly.

Sd/~
JUDGE