High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Parmamamd Mehta vs State Of Bihar on 25 November, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Parmamamd Mehta vs State Of Bihar on 25 November, 2010
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                      Cr.Misc. No.35258 of 2010
                PARMANAND MEHTA, S/o Gorelal Mehta.
                                Versus
                         THE STATE OF BIHAR
                               -----------

03. 25.11.2010 Supplementary-affidavit filed today be kept on

record.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for

the offences under Sections 25 (1-B) A and 26 of the Arms

Act.

Considering that the petitioner is in custody

since 14.05.2010 and the present occurrence is

subsequent to this case for kidnapping for purposes of

marriage in which the petitioner has got anticipatory bail,

let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with

two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety

as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Purnea in connection with K. Nagar P.S. Case

No. 141 of 2010 subject to the following conditions:- (i)

That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to

how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also

undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in

the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also
2

state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if

the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar

nature after his release in the present case and thereafter

the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding

for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That

the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive

the police papers on the given date and be present on date

fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates

and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable

to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the

petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled.

The fact that the petitioner is accused in only

other case will be verified by the Magistrate concerned

before releasing the petitioner on bail.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-