Karnataka High Court
M/S United Automobile vs Vasavi Finance Corporation on 17 April, 2009
.3,
3%" Tffi fflfifi Sfififi"? 5? §§£RN?zT2%& 1%" §fi§§.e%§£§E
mgrgs '§'E§§S Tm 1m max' fii? Ami; 2s€ r:?:2§%%%%%&kj%k y
BEEQKE
mg HQETELE mm Jugmm A.%;:s~§,s1§1m&m~&?? ,
2°23 %%«.§¥EimER am 3.33 =
ifimwnéent swwé}
'fififi Efifis Fififi EEEQE 1% EXILE E SE?' €.'§?$ 3,5'?
' . u$?E?'{:E'EGH 95 :2? am ammm 'E"§§ mmggm Afw
" , f'EE€RE2E EAEEQ 2$.$,§§%5 magfirm m $3.K::2.f?§; 23% me'
3? THE fififii», GF§§B.; ; f3§éflBL5§ Afifi €§E£§
SH%{K}fi!s.,. BEQREEEQQ "§§E SE31"? F33 Kfififififigfi' €23?
fiflfifi.
uruwrflilrfi nuswajfmwwxi WE' fimKNfi"¥"flKfi. H563 fififliwf flfi WfiWNfi'i"flKfl HEQEWE QTWMK? Q? §mxRNA"¥'AE(A HIQH C
.3,
'£'ffiS RF.A. Cfléflfi Q5'? FGE $53553 fififi
fifisff, Tffi $€3UR'§ DEEIVEREE fifis ?$I%'§JE$?:
«.3 13 E G M E N T
The ieamfi zzmfzzmei fur the ::--
mme réamtm 313% '$316 3§3§§a1 as c1§;aé»;fl%3'§*»'&4§%5d" §é 7
wmwdg figmnrdfilyg, tibia ap@1v'§a«-..§i&:$.;£.:¢%sr-2:3
pqwaw.
fimm fig. amt' mi ta: fag ta
{Em agwiiams' £635 _ in
Sactszbn 56 9f age and mm
Vaklafian fiat? A. :97
.....
Judge
« vat’